Paul the Younger Blocks Iran Sanctions
Rand, senator from Kentucky, wants anti-war clarification attached to bill
A new Iran sanctions bill hit a snag in the U.S. Senate yesterday with Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, placing a hold on it. He wants the Democratic leadership to allow him to add an amendment that clarifies that nothing in the bill “shall be construed as a declaration of war or an authorization of use of force against Iran or Syria.” Paul said on the floor, “Before sending our young men and women into combat, we should have a mature and thoughtful debate over the ramifications of war, over the advisability of war and over the objectives of war.” Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada and Majority Leader, was disappointed with Paul’s move.
The Republican primary candidacy of Rep. Ron Paul, Rand’s father, has been the dog that didn’t bark this campaign season: though he was polling first in Iowa at one point in December, after some decent showings in early contests, he never caught on; even his more muted mission of amassing enough delegates to make an impact at the convention looks Quixotic at this point.
But that’s not to suggest the Paul family is necessarily done with Republican politics. Rand is seen as much more palatable than his father, and has much more appeal among rank-and-file Republicans, particularly Tea Partiers, than his father (whose base is more independent and libertarian, and contains Democrats as well as Republicans). Yet this latest move suggests that on certain issues of concern to the organized Jewish community, the apple might not fall so far from the tree. He will be worth watching in 2016 and beyond.
Bibi-tapped professor discusses Israel’s other systemic problems
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.