Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Migron Lawyer: ‘It’s Our Brown v. Board’

Celebrates Supreme Court victory, says Knesset has no further move

Print Email
Migron earlier this year.(Ahmad Gharabli/AFP/Getty Images)

On Sunday, Michael Sfard, an Israeli human-rights attorney (as well as former IDF paramedic) scored a big victory. The Israeli Supreme Court ruled that a compromise that would have kept Migron, the West Bank’s most populous illegal outpost (that is, an unauthorized settlement built on private land), intact into 2015 was void; the town, which sits atop a hill east of Ramallah, must disappear by August. Sfard was employed by the left-wing Israeli group Peace Now to represent six Palestinian petitioners who are registered to some of the land Migron occupies, three of whom died in the course of the years-long litigation. He spoke with Tablet Magazine this morning about the importance of the Migron decision—and why it’s not the end of the story. The interview has been edited slightly for clarity.

I’m very … happy’s not the right word, but content. I think the ruling is important. The danger of an opposite ruling was really a big threat, because in some way Migron became Israel’s 21st-century test of whether we really uphold the rule of law and whether any communities amongst Israeli society is above the law. And I did feel, while litigating the case, that there was a huge clash between the executive and the judiciary here, and the question of who will prevail is extremely important here, not just for Migron.

Do you trust the government to abide by and implement the decision? Prime Minister Netanyahu said he would.
I don’t want to sound naive, but I truly believe that there are enough forces among Israeli society that would not allow the government to disobey a clear, final, and binding ruling of the highest court in our land. If I’m wrong, then on Aug. 2 Israel would not be the same country. It’s our Brown v. Board of Education. That case was about equality and integration, but I don’t mean that: I’m referring to the question of the importance of implementing final court decisions, and the analogy is that I hope our government will send the National Guard, or the equivalent, to make sure.

Why is Migron especially important?
It’s the biggest outpost in the West Bank. It houses the sons and daughters of the leadership of the settler movement. Migron is a flagship outpost in size and in coming from the aristocracy of the settlers.

Also, Migron is located on registered land. During the British Mandate, the British began a land registration. Israel has continued registration, and we have now full land registration. Jordan continued land registration in the West Bank. When Israel conquered the West Bank in 1967, it stopped the registration, and at that point 30 percent had already gone through registration, while in 70 percent it was not finalized. Migron is located in an area that was already registered, so it is impossible to dispute ownership and rights. In other cases I litigate—the second-largest outpost is in Gush Etzion, on private Palestinian land, but not registered land—upon litigating the case, when the state found itself in a similar position, they saw something similar, they said, “We are declaring a land survey to make sure that indeed your clients are the owners of the land. Maybe someone else is the owner.” And of course, the survey is just an excuse, and in fact they’re doing nothing. They can do that when it’s unregistered.

Some have said the Knesset can step in and prevent Migron’s evacuation. How does that work?
It’s difficult for me to explain it to myself. It’s a bit like children, when they are not happy with something, saying, “I’ll call my big brother, and he will show you.” When the court decided, the right wing said we will legislate in a way that will free us from this decision. The problem is that to circumvent the court decision by legislation, it must apply to the West Bank. Israeli legislation does not apply to the West Bank! Israel has never annexed or applied Israeli law to the West Bank. The Knesset doesn’t exercise jurisdiction over the West Bank. Even if it did, the kind of legislation needed would nationalize land, private property. That is not something that is constitutional. In the small number of exceptions that it is legal, it’s for very important public interests. There’s no public interest here, there’s only private interest. This is a bundle of nonsense.

Who owns the land?
Several dozen families in two villages call Burqua and Dir Dibwan. The area, the hill on which Migron is located, was divided into very small plots compared to other areas, so the number of owners is very large.

Three of the petitioners unfortunately died throughout the hearing of the case. Two died awaiting ruling, one recently died waiting for the implementation. They were all Palestinians who were registered as land-owners. The other three are younger and they are heirs of the registered owners.

Do you have other, similar cases pending?
I’m involved in more than 30 other cases at different stages.

Earlier: Supreme Court Nixes Deal Over Illegal Outpost

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Aviela, Proud Resident of Migron says:

You report that Migron was built on private land, but this has not been proven in court. Legally, it is still classified under the Office of Abandoned Property. The plots were handed out in the early 1960s by the King of Jordan under the condition that they be farmed within three years, otherwise they would revert back to the Crown. By the time the Six Day War rolled around, none of these registrants owned these plots, as no plot of Migron had been farmed at all, and this is documented. What’s more, the suit is over an area on which sit seven mobile homes, which we have offered, a number of years ago, to move.
Please, people… accuracy.
We are very happy to host rabbis, synagogue groups and youth groups for visits here. I can be reached at aviela.deitch @
A happy and uplifting Passover to us all!

Congradulations! Patiently, your long, hard work is rewarded! Thank you, on behalf of humanity for you unflagging efforts! LA Jews for Peace works diligently for Palestinian human rights and joins millions of world citizens, among them, thousands of jews, who seek justice.

Sara G. says:

This has dragged through the courts for years. The supreme court made its ruling.
The settlers will be satisfied only if they get their way.
Time to decide, is Israel a state ruled by law, or is it subject to agendas set by those who flout the law. Are members of Knesset entitled to incite civil disobedience?
This is not a choice between Shalom Achshav or the settlers. This is a fight for a state of law and order and justice. This is a battle for Bayit Shlishi!

Baba Wawa says:

Is Israel ruled by law? If the land cannot be proven to belong to the Palestinians, which is has not been, despite what the lawyer here says, then what rule of law won? When the left has no moral or legal standing, they lie, and push their claims through a supreme court that is appointed via a system more like a theocracy rather than a representative democracy. Long live Migron!

The real Brown vs Board of Education for the settlements would be for the rights of the Palestinians to live in them, or to simply drive their cars through the streets.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Migron Lawyer: ‘It’s Our Brown v. Board’

Celebrates Supreme Court victory, says Knesset has no further move

More on Tablet:

Wolf Blitzer Explores His Jewish Roots

By David Meir Grossman — CNN host visits Yad Vashem and Auschwitz for the network’s ‘Roots’ series