MVP Braun Evades Suspension
Overturned on technical grounds, though he maintains totals innocence
Having become the first baseball player anyone can remember to successfully appeal a positive drug test, reigning National League Most Valuable Player Ryan Braun, the Jewish Milwaukee Brewers outfielder, held a press conference, and Ron Kaplan reported on it. Braun insisted, as he has before, that no illegal substance “entered [his] body at any point.” (He also denied having a disease that may have tripped the test, which is a rumor I’ve heard and read. Google a bit if you want.)
The slight strangeness here, of course, is that he got off on a technical violation. Emily Bazelon has a thoughtful essay about what this says about the American commitment to (critics would say fetishization of) procedural safeguards. Essentially, the lab screwed up, holding his urine for 48 hours when it was supposed to have sent it immediately. So we don’t know that he actually didn’t, knowingly or unknowingly, take illegal substances; and we also don’t know that he did. We may never know. What we do know is that he’ll face no suspension. All the better: let’s get him back on the field and judge him by his performance there and by his next test, which you can be sure will be executed properly.
Or you could take your cues from Braun’s buddy, who probably has one more Super Bowl MVP than you do:
Braun Wins Appeal on Positive Drug Test and Avoid Suspension [NYT]
Ryan Braun’s Press Conference: The ‘Nightmare’ Is Over [Kaplan’s Korner]
Pee Brain [Slate]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.