A Jewish Guide to the Florida Primary
South Beach ballots
Number of candidates actually contesting: Four.
Their names: Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum.
Percentage of state population that is Jewish: 3.4.
Where that ranks: Fifth out of 50. (Can you guess the top four? Answer after the jump.)
Jewish issues? Not hugely, and there isn’t much disagreement: At the most recent debate, Romney gave his Israel spiel, and Gingrich responded, “Gov. Romney is exactly right.” Of course, there is Romney’s Great Kosher Food Nursing Home Scandal, which actually is neither great nor scandalous nor Romney’s.
Who’s going to win? Mitt Romney, almost certainly.
Does it matter? Yes. Newt needs this one, bad.
Open or closed primary? Closed.
So, your Democratic grandmother isn’t going to accidentally vote for Ron Paul? No butterfly-ballot concerns.
Proportional or winner-take-all? Winner-take-all. That’s why Santorum long ago gave up and Paul didn’t waste much time (since he is all about accumulating delegates over the long haul).
Number of delegates to the Republican National Convention: 50.
Number of delegates to the Republican National Convention it would have if it hadn’t moved up its primary against party rules: 100.
(The Democratic Party did the exact same thing, right? Yes. They’re both hypocrites.)
What’s next? Nevada, February.
So, more Jews! Yup.
Percentage-wise, the leaders are New York (8.4), New Jersey (5.7), Massachusetts (4.2), and the great state of Maryland (4.1).
Plus old anti-Semites say they are ‘the new Jews,’ and more in the news
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.