An unlikely tête-à-tête in Lebanon
If there were an inspiring Middle East counterpoint to the gruesome scenes of Iranian students and protesters being beaten or shot to death, it would be the election in Lebanon earlier this month, in which Hezbollah was defeated. Now comes word that Saad al-Hariri, the son of slain politician Rafiq Hariri, whose assassination in 2005 sparked the Cedar Revolution, is likely to be named prime minister. His nomination will have to be confirmed by a tenuous unity government that consists of Hezbollah and various sympathizer parties, but more interesting is the fact that Hariri recently met with Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who, despite a post-election demand for a unity government that granted his Islamist party the right to veto legislation, seems almost bowed in defeat. Consider the joint statement that Hariri and Nasrallah issued after their confab, in which they “agreed on continuing discussions in the current positive calm atmosphere and stressed the logic of dialogue, cooperation and openness.” (You would never know that one of the signatories to this statement precipitated a bloody and costly war against Israel three summers ago.)
Nonetheless, Hariri must suspect, as do many other regional observers, that Syrian-affiliated Hezbollah played a role in the murder of his beloved father. Hariri fils has refrained from shouting about the perfidy of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad since the establishment in March of an international tribunal to try the suspected killers, though judging by this latest meeting of the minds, his reticence may now owe also to political calculation.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.