What the Iranian Plot Means
For starters, is it credible?
There is plenty of fun cloak-and-dagger and goofy stuff for aficionados of that sort of thing in the U.S.’s accusations against Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards for plotting to kill the Saudi and Israeli ambassadors and attack those countries’ embassies in Washington, D.C. One question being sorted out now is: how much should we really believe of the allegations? The Times’s Neil MacFarquhar reports that the whole thing feels uncharacteristic of the Iranian militia, which usually uses proxies like Hezbollah for foreign attacks and is rarely so sloppy. Iran, of course, has denied all involvement, and sent an angry letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon protesting the “warmongering policies of the United States.” Yet both Kenneth Pollack and Eli Lake have persuasive pieces arguing that the attack is in keeping with Iran’s “shadow war” against the U.S., if representing something of an escalation of it. (And recall that it is a two-way war: see Stuxnet.)
Take a step back, though, and you see the following: the utter failure of Iran to launch its audacious attack; a clear example of why U.S.-Israel and Saudi Arabia should be cold allies, something that was tested recently over U.S. opposition to the Palestinian Authority’s U.N. gambit; and the further strengthening of that cold alliance, perhaps, in the form of slowly drawing Hamas away from Iran-Syria. President Obama has known about the plot since June, and so it must have been on Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s mind when he was in Cairo last week, potentially helping to orchestrate the release of Gilad Shalit. All this stuff feels connected. If they are, it means that the administration is jiu-jitsuing Iran’s “warmongering policies” to the U.S.’s advantage.
U.S. Accuses Iranians of Plotting to Kill Saudi Envoy [NYT]
Odd Twist for Elite Unit Guiding Iran’s Proxy Wars [NYT]
Iran Appeals to Ban Ki-Moon over U.S. Allegations of Terror Plot Against Saudi Ambassador [FP Turtle Bay]
Iran’s Covert War Against the United States [Daily Beast]
U.S.-Iran Shadow War Escalates [Daily Beast]
Earlier: U.S. Prisoner Unsung Player in Shalit Affair
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.