Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


September Dawns, the General Assembly Nears

Will the P.A. go through with its statehood bid?

Print Email
President Abbas this past weekend.(Abbas Momani/AFP/Getty Images)

Last week, it was clear that the Palestinian Authority is basically the only group deeply involved in the Mideast conflict that supports its own planned drive for a status upgrade—and possibly for statehood—at the United Nations later this month (yup, it’s September now). Israel and the U.S. are against (they want a negotiated resolution); Hamas and Hezbollah are against (they want all of the land, not a compromise); the Palestinian diaspora is against (they would lose representation at the U.N.). Here’s another: King Abdullah of Jordan has reportedly asked President Abbas to reconsider the U.N. gambit—he’s worried that such a move would put at risk the larger goal of a Palestinian right of return; it’s possible he cares about this because lots of Palestinians live in Jordan and some day the Hashemite monarchy might have its own demographic crisis to face. Add, as well, the Israeli left, which analogizes a hypothetical Palestinian state to the Bantustans of apartheid South Africa. (“Are Palestinians walking into a trap at the U.N.?” Dimi Reider asks, even though there is no trap—it’s the P.A.’s idea and initiative). And add also the humanitarian perspective, articulated by this article, which states that it would be irresponsible, even immoral of the international community to grant the territories the trappings of statehood before they are actually ready for it. “The U.N. will be recognizing a state whose government(s) maintains questionable legitimacy among its own population, is maligned by deep corruption and internal fighting, lacks control over terror cells that undermine all peace efforts, is depressingly mismanaged and is completely dependent on Israeli industry,” Avi Yesawich writes. “The world will be voting into existence a welfare state that currently owes much of its sustenance to the donations of the international community and Israeli tax transfers.”

Yet most signs point to its going forward. Israel is readying for General Assembly approval—they know there’s no way for them stop it—anticipating potential challenges both legal and physical. Indeed, in addition to West Bank reinforcements, the IDF is actually training settler security teams. That said, it should be noted that the P.A. strategy is to refrain from violence. Here’s hoping.

One gets the sickening sense that, for two years or so, Palestinian statehood at the U.N. was a bluff: not a bad one, but one that has been called; and now it is in no one’s interests more than the bluffer’s to fold.

Jordan Urges Abbas to Rethink U.N. Bid [YNet]
Are Palestinians Walking Into a Trap at the U.N.? [+972]
The Day After Palestine [Ynet]
Israel Braces for Palestinian Statehood at the U.N. [WP]
Israel Intensifies Training of Settler Security Teams [NYT]
Earlier: Is the P.A. Statehood Drive Good for the P.A.?

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

What’s that? negating their diaspora? who does the PA think they are? Israel?


Stupid Muslims, and stupid liberal enablers.

So the Mohammedans will get yet another crappy Shawarma Republic. Zippidy Doo Dah! What are they up to? Number 235, already? I guess it depends whether Deerborn, Malmo and other crapistan Islamic colonies count. And how about those riots at the Rye Playland yesterday, eh? Good thing Obama is importing as many of his co-religionists as he can before next November! Of course the vast majority of Muslim immigrants are war criminals, but Obama hopes they bring their wonderfully diverse values to the United States and help make the entire United States a Shawarma Republic. Or as Imam Faisal Ra’uf threatened in Scotland – violently make the U.S. shari’ah-compliant.

Does anyone really expect that this new Reichlet will be anything but a cesspool of psychotic Nazis, genocidal imams, and suicidal children. In other words a typical Islamic freakshow of generic inferiority, moral filth and physical repulsiveness. What a special moment.

But at least we have something to look forward to. In another few decades, the beasts will toss out their dictator, riot in the streets, and top-off their Arab Spring of 2031 by electing a new KKKaliph dictator to rule them. I can see why liberals are so excited! Yay Arab Spring! Yay Shari’ah!

* geneTic inferiority. Because of their Shari’ah-compliant environmental policies and cousin-marriage.

Beatrix says:

The Palestinians lost their nation when they attacked Israel. And they have continued with their attacks. They are as much in diaspora as Germany and Japan were when we occupied them after the war. The solution is the same for Palestine as it was for those countries—a negotiated peace.

At least the Axis powers had stable governments at one time. Palestinians have had neither stability nor an independent government, only occupation, first by Rome, then the Ottoman Empire, then by England, and now Israel. If she seriously wanted peace and independence, she should be welcoming Israel and America’s help.

The Palestinians, numbering about 8 million people, are Arabs, a people that numbers more than 300 million. They are predominately Islamic, a group that numbers 1½ billion. They are allied with the Persians, 74 million, and the Turks, 75 million. In addition, they have the sympathy of the world.

Yet, with all this power and support, they present themselves to the world as a small, picked on minority bulldozed by 5 million Jewish Israelis who won’t let themselves be bulldozed by anyone. Do you really think the Palestinians are ready for independence?

Please stop using the term “Palestinian”.

The rag-tag group of subhuman war criminals trying to colonize Israel are from Iraq (“al-Basri”, “al-Baghdadi”, “al-Qurdi”) Nazi Germany (“Husseiny”, “al-Aryan”) and Egypt (“al-Masri”). They are not a nation. True – they are unified and unique in their wickedness and subhumanity. But a nation? No.

Ask the beasts. The Muslim colonizers of Gaza and Deerborn will tell you that they see themselves primarily as SoA (soldiers of Allah). Not as “Palestinians”. Not as Americans. They act identically – as colonizers – whether they are violently rioting for shari’ah-compliance at the Rye Playland, worshipping Mohammed at meKKKa, or committing genocide at Gaza. The enemy sees itself exclusively as part of a world-wide imperialistic KKKaliphate. Not as “Palestinians”

Don’t call these commentators “Jews”: they are nothing of the sort, and harbor xenophobic, racist viewpoints.

Beatrix says:

So many lefties, many of whom were Jews, supported the Communists in the 1930s that when McCarthy held Senate hearings in the 1950s to learn why Americans supported a vile dictator like Stalin while espousing a political belief that was determined to destroy America and her values, people thought his hearings were antisemitic. That’s why he hired two Jewish lawyers to serve with him.

I don’t support McCarthy or his tactics. And I don’t support attacking middle-aged people for the nonsense they believed when they were young.

But I can see 20-30 years from now a senator wanting to make a name for himself by investigating people who were lefties today and who supported Islamic Jihadists who were dedicated to the destruction of America, Europe, Israel and all Western values.

Thank goodness Jews of tomorrow can point to some Jews today, who were not mindless lefties who’s brains had been turned to mush by Arab propaganda and who continued to support American and Israeli Western values. (As usual, Europe will choose to go to whichever side wins). In fact, in the future, the only Arab nation the West may be able to count on, thanks to Israel, is Palestine.

Beatrix says:

I will never post again if there is no edit button.

My feeling is that Palestine’s reluctance to get free of Israel despite many, many opportunities, probably means that she’s going to stay close to Israel and America in the future. I think she enjoys the public approval she gets from the West and the Mideast by calling for her freedom, but I don’t think she wants to fully relinquish Western support.

Other, more powerful, Mideastern nations may choose to compete with us or even to continue their enmity toward the West, and so in the future, we may find Palestine, along with Israel, remaining America’s only dependable ally, while other Mideast nations may turn out to be fair weather friends.

Europe’s disturbing behavior during WW2 (France had the Vichy Government led by French Nazis, Norway had the Quislings, Norwegian Nazis, Austrians handed themselves over to the Nazis, Poland had a very troubled history toward Jews under the Nazis, and Italy fought on Germany’s side, etc.) led me to consider the possibility that Europe would ally themselves with whoever wins. Even England has changed. WW2 was her finest hour as well as Denmark’s.

Racism? Xenophobia?

What race is Mohammed-worship? Mohammed-worshippers come from Jewish backgrounds (Adam Gadahn); African (Hussein Soetoro); and white (Lauren Booth). They are tall (Usama bin Laden), they are short (this little dude; they are fat (Ibish) and skinny (Soetoro, again).

Hatred of Islamic imperialism is as racist as hatred of Belgian imperialism. Hatred of Mohammed-worship, is as racist as hatred of führer-worship.

As for Xenophobia, its kind of rich for the Mohammedan world which whines about “Colonialism” as the source of all their wickedness, and who riot and slaughter at the sight of a Jew, to have a problem with Xenoophobia. How about this: when apartheid Mecca is dismantled, the Mohammedans can start whining about how the West treats the “other”.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

September Dawns, the General Assembly Nears

Will the P.A. go through with its statehood bid?

More on Tablet:

Making Sex Education Smarter

By Marjorie Ingall — Teenagers need to learn about more than anatomy, as some Jewish educators already know