Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

Daybreak: Internal Dispute Over Iran Weapons

Plus, an anti-Assad tune, and more in the news

Print Email
An air defense missile paraded through Tehran.(Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty Images)

• President Ahmadinejad would like Iran to pursue nuclear weapons openly but is opposed on this issue by the mullah leaders, according to a new AP intelligence assessment. [AP/WP]

• Great report on the Palestinian statehood drive at the United Nations from the perspective of the Israelis. [Turtle Bay]

• Lebanon signed an energy exploration deal with Iran, which both may violate U.N. sanctions and be seen as provocative given the dispute over offshore natural gas fields. [JPost]

• Hamas and Fatah representatives will meet in Cairo later this month to continue work on reconciliation. Good luck with that, dudes. [JPost]

• “Come on Bashar, Leave.” It’s catchy if you sing it right. [NYT]

• The Kletzky family has established a memorial fund in memory of their slain eight-year-old son, Leiby. [NYT]

Print Email

COMMENTING CHARGES
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at letters@tabletmag.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Hershel (Heshy) Ginsburg says:

“according to a new AP intelligence assessment”

I didn’t know that the AP was an intelligence agency or had spies, satellites, wiretaps, SigInt & other sources of espionage at their disposal.

hg

That piece in Foreign Policy seems like pure revisionism to me. Israel and Palestine haven’t failed to establish an understanding because Arafat demurred on some question of territorial concessions in 1994. They have failed because Arafat turned down the offer of an independent state in 2000, and because Abbas did the same several years later, despite Israel’s having forcibly removed its own settlers from Gaza.

How can a reporter fail to mention this? Did I miss it?

Colum Lynch, like so many of his colleagues in the press, does terrible violence to the truth by effectively wiping the historical slate clean and maintaining the fiction that both sides in this drama have been equally intransigent. It’s a comforting notion for a mindset determined not to assign blame, or even agency, to the actors in a conflict. But it is a fiction, and the prevailing narrative is not Israeli; it is Western Liberal.

That’s not to say that Netanyahu hasn’t been stalling, or that he might not have the propensity toward reconciliation necessary to overcome the current impasse. I don’t think he does. But it was the Palestinians who elected Netanyahu, by rebuffing Barak, and answering Sharon’s wholesale territorial concession with a fusillade of missiles, to say nothing of Barak’s evacuation of Lebanon. This doesn’t constitute an Israeli narrative. It’s the truth.

The problem in eliding over these facts is that, while it preserves a worldview that takes as doctrinal the idea that reasoned dialogue will ultimately establish harmony among nations, it continues to obfuscate the real cause of the problem. And if the real cause isn’t addressed, the problem will just continue to fester.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Daybreak: Internal Dispute Over Iran Weapons

Plus, an anti-Assad tune, and more in the news

More on Tablet:

Obama: Denying Israel’s Right to Exist as a Jewish Homeland is Anti-Semitic

By Yair Rosenberg — The president draws a line in the sand in his latest interview