Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


E=Lawsuit Squared

You don’t have to be Einstein to smell a rat

Print Email
Albert Einstein (left, with David Ben-Gurion).(Wikipedia)

Last month, a man walked in to a copy shop in Petach Tikvah, a midsize town in central Israel, and told the proprietor he wanted to print 40 T-shirts with Albert Einstein’s face emblazoned on the front. Not a problem, said the proprietor, Ben Farag. At the customer’s request, he printed out a sample T-shirt and handed it over. Which is where the story begins.

This week, Farag received a letter from a law firm representing Hebrew University in Jerusalem, which owns the intellectual property rights to Einstein’s estate. “Our client,” it read, “was astounded to discover that at your store—you are printing shirts and other products with the late Prof. Albert Einstein’s image. The use that you made is public and commercial use which constitutes damage to the brand and blatant damage to the rights of our client under the law.” It didn’t take a genius to figure out that this was all a sting; the law firm’s letter included a snapshot taken by the ostensible customer, showing Farag holding the sample T-shirt. Hebrew U., the letter continued, demanded 20,000 NIS (approximately $5,600) in compensation.

After the newspaper contacted the university, a spokesperson called the copy shop owner to apologize. The university, he said, had outsourced matters pertaining to Einstein’s intellectual property to a private company, which, in turn, hired an investigator to identify unauthorized usage. The sting was the private eye’s bright idea.

Einstein, who was instrumental in helping raise funds for the university’s founding in 1925, delivered the institution’s first scientific lecture, a talk on relativity. The rights to his intellectual property, according to some estimates, net the university approximately $1 million per year—and more, presumably, in legal action, given that, inthe last three years alone, the university has sued the Israeli cellular giant Pelephone, General Motors, and Google for using the wild-haired genius’s name or likeness without permission.

Hebrew U. Rep Resorts to Relatively Dirty Tricks To Protect Einstein’s Image [Haaretz]
Related: Relatively Speaking, a Zionist

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

D'vorah says:

I saw a program on television (60 Minutes I think but am not sure) about a lawyer that represents hundreds of dead clients and their images. People like Elvis, Bette Davis, Ava Gardner. At the time, I was astounded that such an industry could even exist. I had always assumed that things like images of dead people were like music — that the copyright, if you will, expired after about 50 years after the death of the composer. I think this story reflects pretty poorly on Hebrew University. I’m glad that they apologized. I would be appalled to know that they had not. I guess I can feel okay about sending in my annual donation now.

Isn’t there something missing between your second and third paragraphs in this story, something telling how the shopkeeper took this story to a newspaper which followed it up?


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

E=Lawsuit Squared

You don’t have to be Einstein to smell a rat

More on Tablet:

How To Make Middle Eastern Stuffed Vegetables

By Joan Nathan — Video: Filled with warm rice and unexpected spices, they’re perfect for a cool autumn night—as a side dish or vegetarian entree