Rosenfels Torches Rams for 3 TDs
Jewish QB makes his case for playing-time
UPDATE: Almost immediately after I published this, Favre basically announced he is returning. I blame myself.
As the Minnesota Vikings desperately send three of their best players down to Hattiesburg, Mississippi, to find out if their presumable starting quarterback, Brett Favre, is planning on actually suiting up this year, a fight is raging among their two other quarterbacks over which will appear second on the depth chart—or, if Favre does retire, over which will start. And if the Vikings’ first preseason game yesterday is any indication, Jewish quarterback Sage Rosenfels has a real chance.
Rosenfels lit up the St. Louis Rams for three touchdowns, no interceptions, and 23 completions on 34 attempts for 310 yards in their game a few days ago. (Tarvaris Jackson, who is currently the starter, only played a few downs at the beginning.) Caveat number on is that the Rams are so dreadful it’s almost immoral. Caveat number two is that, it being the first preseason game, Rosenfels did the bulk of his work against the Rams’s second-teamers, which is basically the equivalent of decent D2 school (I exaggerate—and it’s worth nothing that Rosenfels was working with his team’s scrubs, too).
So this is exciting! Even if Favre does come back, we will likely see the 32-year-old Rosenfels taking a few snaps (unlike last season). And if Favre doesn’t—and Tablet Magazine’s official position is henceforth that he shouldn’t—then Rosenfels will genuinely be fighting for the starting job. Go Vikings?
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.