Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


The ADL Boycotts Boycotts

Foxman speaks on UC-Irvine Oren incident

Print Email
Oren last November.(Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty)

You would think that the Anti-Defamation League would be, at the least, agnostic on a proposed boycott of the University of California, Irvine, if not outright supportive of one. Last week, Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren was shouted down during a lecture there by members of the university Muslim Student Union, who taunted, among other things, “How many Palestinians did you kill today?” A boycott would probably be unfair—Irvine’s chancellor, after all, who was present, unequivocally condemned the outburst, saying he was embarassed by it. At the same time, the impulse surely exists at the group.

But in fact, the ADL has gone out of its way to oppose a boycott. Partly, one suspects, out of a sense of fair play, as well as of prudence: the group has far more weight when lobbying the university to cultivate a “safe, respectful atmosphere,” if it is on-record opposing a boycott.

There’s another reason the ADL is against a boycott of UC-Irvine, though. Said—who else?—ADL head Abraham Foxman:

We are surprised that those who call for a boycott fail to recognize that it is a double-edged sword that legitimizes a tactic so often used against Jews and Israel, particularly in academic settings. We believe academic boycotts are inappropriate, harmful and counterproductive, and will not work to resolve the situation on campus.

Meanwhile, the ADL’s release praised the chancellor for his “swift, clear, and appropriate” response while insisting that more needed to be done. It acknowledged that the heckling led to 11 arrests, while taking no position on them; the Muslim Public Affairs Council has called for an investigation into them, while the Council on American Islamic Relations has asserted that they violated the First Amendment. (Whether they did or didn’t is a question of line-drawing: suffice to say that not all speech is protected like all other speech, and heckling a lecturer falls pretty wide on the less-protected side of the spectrum.)

ADL: U.S. Jews Mustn’t Boycott University for Heckling of Israeli Envoy [Haaretz]

Earlier: ADL, J Street Condemn UC-Irvine Incident

Print Email
lainie friedman says:

I applaud the ADL’s response against a boycott of UCI. UCI had the speaker Ambassador Oren there in good faith. It was the demonstrators who were violating free speech. They had planned the disruption very well and simply would not let Ambassador Oren speak. I was there. It is a matter for UCI to handle and I agree that a boycott is not appropriate against the university. It is a tactic that has been used too much against Jews and Israel, particularly in academic settings. How about working together to solve the problem instead of a boycott, which is simply a divisive deadend tactic.

Dorothy Wachsstock says:

Okay..I am late in replying but have to catch up.been ill…..the reason that the ADL doesn’t believe in boycotts is because they do not only represent the Jewish community anymore. I hope they took “Jewish” off their stationary. The ADL has a small dept for anti-semitism but now defends Palestinians as well so how could they go against Muslims since they represent them?
Unfortunately, the ADL holds fund raising from Jewish donors who are not aware that they are donating money to help those who want to kill Jews.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

The ADL Boycotts Boycotts

Foxman speaks on UC-Irvine Oren incident

More on Tablet:

Rediscovering the First Woman Rabbi

By Laura Geller — Ordained in 1935, Regina Jonas died at Auschwitz. Now, she’s being honored.