U.N. Debates Goldstone Report
And Fatah says government will fall if report isn’t approved
The Geneva-based U.N. Human Rights Council is meeting today to debate whether to adopt the conclusions of last month’s controversial Goldstone report on the Gaza war—including its proposal to refer allegations of war crimes on the part of both the Israelis and Hamas to the International Criminal Court. But what started out as a referendum on Israel is increasingly looking like a test of how far the international community is prepared to go to protect the Fatah-led Palestinian government.
Originally, the Palestinians—under pressure from the Americans—indicated they were prepared to drop the report altogether in the interest of restarting peace negotiations. But after petitions started circulating calling for president Mahmoud Abbas to step down over the episode, Fatah is reportedly telling other countries that their government will fall if they can’t get the report adopted in Geneva and prove they can score political points against Israel on the international stage. The Israelis, of course, aren’t going to risk a compromise on the report to give cover to a Palestinian executive that so far has been willing to negotiate in good faith: Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, Aharon Leshno-Yaar, said Israel will interpret any action by the council as “Israel bashing.”
U.N. Says Israel, Palestinians Committed War Crimes [AP]
PA: Abbas Gov’t Will Fall if Goldstone Report Not Adopted [Haaretz]
Related: Report Card [Tablet]
Portrayal in soap opera set during Gaza War comes as bilateral relationship struggles
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.