Bombing Suspects Were Headed to Times Square
A surplus of weapons and a spontaneous plan that never came to fruition
Another surprising development in the case of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects: New York was next on their list. At a news conference in New York this afternoon, NYPD Commish Raymond W. Kelly explained the two suspects had a number of pipe bombs and a improvised explosive similar to the one used in the Boston Marathon attacks.
But their plan was foiled, Mr. Kelly said, because the vehicle they had carjacked did not have enough gas to reach New York. When the suspects stopped for fuel, the carjacking victim escaped and the police were notified.
As if this weren’t surreal enough, the bombing suspects reportedly purchased supplies for their attacks at the same fireworks store that Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad had visited before building a car bomb in his 2010 attempting bombing.
As the JTA reported yesterday, Bruce Zoldan, the CEO of the B.J. Alan Company, is taking heat because his fireworks company allegedly sold bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev fireworks.
Times Square Was Boston Bombing Suspects’ Next Target, Officials Say [NYT]
Boston man got crackers from same store as Times Square bomber [Business Standard]
Jewish fireworks CEO forced to defend sale to Tsarnaev [JTA]
‘The Daily Show’ host is making a flick about an imprisoned Iranian journalist
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.