Corrections on the NYT Dani Dayan Profile
Jodi Rudoren makes a pretty big gaffe
As I mentioned in Daybreak, Dani Dayan, leader of the settler movement in Israel, was the topic of the Saturday Profile in the Times this weekend. You may recall that Dayan became a figure of interest to the Times-reading crowd after writing a controversial opinion piece declaring victory for the one-state solution.
Today, the Times ran the following corrections (h/t Miriam Krule) to the profile, which was written by semi-new Jerusalem bureau chief Jodi Rudoren:
The Saturday Profile article, about the leader of Israel’s settlement movement, Dani Dayan, included several errors. The underground military organization led by the revisionist Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinsky is the Irgun, not the Haganah. One of Mr. Dayan’s critics, Itzik Shadmi, serves as chairman of the settlers’ committee in the Binyamin Region, not as chairman of the Binyamin Council. (That position is held by Avi Roeh.) Mr. Dayan moved to Israel with his family from Buenos Aires in 1971, not in 1979. And Mr. Dayan’s father, Moshe, was a second cousin — not a first — to Gen. Moshe Dayan.
Yes, those are a lot of errors to make. But one of them stands out as particularly egregious. Confusing the Irgun, the organization led by revisionist Zionist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky, with the Haganah is a pretty startling misstep for someone whose post depends a lot on knowing context. There’s no real political equivalent that comes to mind, but this would be like a music journalist writing that John Lennon was the leader of the Monkees. It’s pretty difficult to write that sentence.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.