Replacing Tal Law Proves Tal Order (Sorry)
Kadima says Netanyahu backtracked on pledge to get serious about draft
The Tal Law replacement saga continues. (Theoretically, it will end at the end of the month, when it expires, but you never know in Israeli politics.) When last we checked in, Prime Minister Netanyahu, having disbanded the Plesner Committee once it became clear it was serious about drafting more Haredim and Arab Israelis for civil and military service, realized that, no, actually real change needed to happen, and tasked Yochanan Plesner, a Kadima MK, and one of his trusted Likud associates with coming up with a new service law. (By the way, some say the Plesner report, even if its heart was in the right place, was needlessly inflammatory.) But then Plesner withdrew from this new committee and Kadima accused Netanyahu of going back on his pledge to be serious about reform. Kadima has very little leverage, because leaving the coalition would keep Netanyahu’s government intact and in fact make him yet more reliant on the religious parties who oppose all reform, which is why Kadima leader Shaul Mofaz said he’d stay in the government for now (e.g. for as long as he is useful to Bibi).
The party to this we haven’t mentioned yet is Bibi’s coalition partner Yisrael Beiteinu, which, though as hawkish as anybody when it comes to the settlements, is also a big believer in loyalty, and therefore wants all Arab Israelis—20 percent of the population, recall—to serve in the civil service, as well as more Haredim in the army. Which means Israel’s last, best hope for a fair national service law may be Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman. So there’s that.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.