Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Friedmometer: Bibi’s Opportunity

Friedman calls on prime minister to put his new coalition to work on peace

Print Email

The Friedmometer tracks left-of-center conventional wisdom about the state of peace in the land between the river and the sea through the eyes of Thomas Friedman.

Today, Friedman marvels at Prime Minister Netanyahu’s formidable new coalition—clever: “There are Arab dictators who didn’t have majorities that big after rigged elections”—makes the well-told (and persuasive) case that it is in Israel’s long-term interests to strike a real deal with the Palestinians, notes that Netanyahu would seem to have the political backing to make such a deal, and then tells Bibi it’s up to him to do it (he suggests Ami Ayalon’s “constructive unilateralism”).

The Friedmometer should, therefore, be way over on the left: the ball is squarely in Bibi’s court, and he’s not returning it, right? Well, what Friedman ignores, elides, or just maybe actually gets is that Netanyahu has that massive coalition in part because he hasn’t made significant moves toward peace. And if most of Friedman’s op-ed is a plea for action, its beefy third paragraph is an explanation of why there has been none:

I’m keeping an open mind, but the temptation for Bibi to do nothing will be enormous. The Palestinians are divided between Hamas in Gaza and the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, and both populations are tired. Moreover, economic conditions have improved in the West Bank in recent years, and the Palestinian Authority’s security forces are keeping a tight rein on anti-Israeli violence. Aid from the U.S., Europe and the Arabs pays a lot of the authority’s budget. Israel’s security wall keeps Palestinian suicide bombers out. The U.S. election silences any criticism coming from Washington about Israeli settlements. The Israeli peace camp is dead, and the Arab awakening has most Arab states enfeebled or preoccupied. So Israel gets to build settlements, while the Arabs, Americans, Europeans and Palestinians fund and sustain a lot of the occupation.

Friedman just described, accurately, a “temptation” which, I’m sad to say, excepting literally George Washington almost every politician would fall for.

Power With Purpose [NYT]
Earlier Friedmometers: Friedmometer: Map on the Damn Table
American Jews Come Around to Israel’s Failings

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Royq says:

Counting myself an admirer of Friedman, I have to say it was disappointing seeing him lose to Anderson Cooper on Jeopardy.  I mean, Eli Whitney!!?

    Unlike you, his pathetic loss on Jeopardy merely confirmed my sense that his knowledge base is wanting plus he has no idea about how to wager.

ginzy1 says:

For a more incisive, less fawning critique of Tom Friedman and an explanation what he (and Marc Tracy) seem incapable of understanding about what Israelis understand, see here:

I should also note that Ami Ayalon has long been rejected by the Israeli electorate.  Which I guess explains why both TF & MT think his ideas are important and worth following.


J’lem / Efrata

Tom Friedman:
When Israel’s government is about to collapse, he notes “it’s a perfect time for Israel to make an overture for peace”
When Israel’s government is solidified into an almost unanimous coalition, he notes “it’s a perfect time for Israel to make an overture for peace”
When Israel is pounded by rockets, he notes “it’s a perfect time for Israel to make an overture for peace”
When Israel strikes back, he notes “it’s a perfect time for Israel to make an overture for peace”
And so on.

So what needs to happen for it to be a perfect time for the Palestinans to make an overture for peace?

Jojo Lolo says:

You should note that in Israel nobody but a few journalists care about this guy and what he says.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Friedmometer: Bibi’s Opportunity

Friedman calls on prime minister to put his new coalition to work on peace

More on Tablet:

How To Make Middle Eastern Stuffed Vegetables

By Joan Nathan — Video: Filled with warm rice and unexpected spices, they’re perfect for a cool autumn night—as a side dish or vegetarian entree