Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

TomKat’s Contract, and Mine

The ketubah—the prenup’s antecedent—proves that, although love is ephemeral, a signature is forever

Print Email

Well, it happened. The mortgage bubble burst, and the stock market crashed. The war in Afghanistan continues to rage (or at least sputter), Iran looks every day dismally closer to having the capability to wipe its entire region off the map in a bout of dictatorial PMS. And finally, the last mess created during the Bush Administration is ready for President Obama to clean up, as if he didn’t have enough to deal with this summer: Katie Holmes has filed for divorce from Tom Cruise.

My bubbe always told me there was nothing less attractive than feigned shock (although she didn’t quite put it that way, and it was mostly in regard to grave misfortune, like your house being burned down by Germans or Poles or Cossacks), so I won’t pretend to be surprised now. We’ve had enough years of paparazzi photographs of a wan, gray-faced Katie listlessly wandering the streets of New York with seemingly no purpose other than to dispense to young Mistress Suri cupcakes, ice creams, and—in the creepy parlance of the Daily Mail—cuddly toys” to know that life in Cruiseland isn’t exactly Risky Business, or even that scene in Rain Man where he teaches Dustin Hoffman to dance.

I’ve always said that the only thing that keeps me from total despair about the future is that at least we’ll have Suri’s tell-all autobiography to look forward to, but from the way things are going—no less a source than TMZ reports a decided “nastiness” apparent in the proceedings—we may not have to wait that long. (Have fun wandering the dystopian nuclear wilderness with nothing to read, folks.) Of all the bizarre details leaking out of the Cruise/Holmes camp: Tom told her what to wear! He wouldn’t let her do the Dawson’s Creek reunion! Her conversion never took and she was terrified of Suri being raised a Scientologist, hence the divorce (the dangers of intermarriage!). And then of course, the alleged contract.

The rumor of its existence, persisting from the very earliest days of their relationship, is always presented in shadowy, sinister terms; a kind of incontrovertible proof that nothing about the couch-jumping, private plane-hopping, zombie-interview-giving couple could possibly be genuine, or even affectionate. This is an attitude that has always puzzled me, since I too have a contractual marriage. So does my mother, my father, my aunts and uncles, and virtually all my married friends. It’s called a ketubah, and it’s pretty much the great-great-great-great (etc.) grandmother (of course it’s a woman, why wouldn’t it be?) of the prenup.

There’s a kind of scene that’s familiar from a certain kind of movie: On the brink of marriage, a wealthy person, usually surrounded by a claque of unsmiling lawyers, demands a signature from his or her intended; said intended is shocked, shocked (remember what my bubbe said?) to be so insulted, and they tear it up (or burn it in a wastebasket, or eat it), which is generally meant to seem like some kind of wild gesture of love instead of what it is: an act of sheer stupidity that will ultimately wind up injuring both partners. I understand sealing the deal with a signature instead of a kiss can seem a little dry to inveterate romantics (i.e., people who have never been married). Yet much to my surprise, I found the signing of the ketubah to be the most moving part of my entire wedding. What started out as a sarcastic lark—I had my agent serve as my witness, because hey, she looks over all my contracts—was soon taken over by solemn tears. Not just at the thought of our life together—I’d gotten used to the idea of that—but because my husband loved me enough to put it in writing. Anyone can say “I love you,” and they do, but a signature on an enforceable legal document is forever.

I don’t know the terms of Katie’s contract any more than I do mine (I was busy worrying about my mascara when the rabbi explained that part), but it seems like she’s done pretty well for herself. All I have to show for my contract so far is a nice watch and some shared debt (and years of happiness, but don’t tell my husband); if the rumors can be believed—and in this age of 24-hour Internet surveillance, it seems increasingly that they can—she’s getting $3 million a year and a $35 million mansion where she can busily set about turning her kid into Chica Barnfeld from Troop Beverly Hills. Nothing says “I loved you” quite like that.

Let’s just hope she was half as lucky negotiating her billion-year contract with Xenu. I hear he’s got a hell of a lawyer.


Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new content in your inbox each morning.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

That’s “1 billion year contract”, not $1 billion per year.

Jay Friedman says:

What does this article have to do with “A New Read on Jewish Life” (The “Tablet” self-description)?

Neither one of the parties is Jewish so how should this concern Tablet Magazine.

Couldn’t have happened to a nicer gnome. “Tomkat” is, once again, smiling out of the otherside of his face…the little runt.

CorpuscleSchism says:
Natan79 says:

Shukert is stupid and pop culture addicted, just like Marc Tracy. Two writers with the brainpower of a broom now write at Tablet. This magazine is intended to show the gentiles that hey, Jews can be imbeciles too!


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

TomKat’s Contract, and Mine

The ketubah—the prenup’s antecedent—proves that, although love is ephemeral, a signature is forever

More on Tablet:

Kerry Links Rise of ISIS With Failed Peace Talks

By Lee Smith — Secretary of State: ‘I see a lot of heads nodding’