D.A. Denies Sex Prosecution Allegations
And why didn’t the NYT cite Jewish reporting in its series?
Brooklyn District Attorney Charles J. Hynes responded to the charges in last week’s New York Times series on the covering up of and/or minimizing of child abuse within some of Brooklyn’s Hasidic communities. “The statistics show how absurd it is to suggest that we cover up, downplay or in any way ‘give a break’ to sex offenders in the Orthodox Jewish community,” he wrote. “Like any other defendants, they are often arrested in public by the police, and their court appearances are open and available to the public as part of the public record. I welcome scrutiny of these cases.”
Mayor Bloomberg’s office has attacked Hynes for alleged favoritism.
Meanwhile, the Village Voice’s Nick Pinto has a different complaint: “many were dismayed,” he reports, “that the Times series failed to credit the work of other reporters who have been on the beat for years.” Many of these reporters, of course, have come from the world of Jewish media; Pinto cites work in Jewish Week and Failed Messiah’s Shmarya Rosenberg.
In Tablet Magazine last year, Paul Berger reported on one Borough Park Scandal in which community members allegedly failed to take complaints to the civil authorities. And also last year, Michael Orbach accused Hynes of not pursuing another sex case against a Brooklyn Hasidic man. So, from all of us at other daily magazines of Jewish life and culture: ahem.
We All Work to Protect Brooklyn’s Kids [NYDN]
Not Fit to Print [Village Voice/JI Daily]
Related: For Ultra-Orthodox in Abuse Cases, Prosecutor Has Different Rules [NYT]
Abuses [Tablet Magazine]
Unmolested [Tablet Magazine]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.