Daybreak: Preparing for the Maybe-Talks
Plus Hezbollah in hot water, and more in the news
• After Iran rejected Istanbul as a host for talks ostensibly to be held next week, many suspect that Iran is simply foot-dragging on talks in general. [NYT]
• David Ignatius reports that President Obama conveyed messages to Iran’s supreme leader through Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan. Chiefly: Iran can have a civilian nuclear program if it means giving up forever on a weapons program. [WP]
• Dennis Ross says that the goal perhaps should be a deal that allows for limited, continued Iranian enrichment, but not to 20 percent and with the closing of the Fordow facility, as an intermediate step toward completely doing away with the alleged weapons program. [Washington Institute]
• It’s gotten to the point that Hezbollah’s continued fealty to Assad is hurting the group. Which means it will either grow less popular or decide to cut ties. We call that one of them good problems. [NYT]
• Seymour Hersh reports that the Iranian opposition group M.E.K.—which the State Department lists as a terrorist organization—and which has in the past been tied to Mossad and potentially to the assassinations of Iranian scientists, had operatives extensively trained by U.S. special forces on U.S. soil (Nevada, natch) in 2005. [New Yorker]
• David P. Goldman, who moonlights as Tablet Magazine’s classical music critic, brings his profession as a risk analyst to bear and determines that, contra Obama, it is lower supply rather than Mideast tensions that have pushed up oil prices. [Gatestone Institute]
Plus Oren defends Israeli democracy, the story behind your soap, and more
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.