More Thoughts on Zimmerman (Who Isn’t Jewish)
What we say about Trayvon Martin’s killer, and what it says about us
My post last week on the likely non-Jewishness of George Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin’s likely killer, clearly struck a chord. A profile that ran over the weekend confirmed that he isn’t: no matter the surname, and whether or not (as many news reports had it) he is Latino, the Zimmermans are faithful, zealous Catholics. The article also noted that Zimmerman’s ambiguously ethnic appearance as well as that surname lent themselves to precisely such speculation: “His father is white, neighbors say. His mother is Latina. And his family is eager to point out that some of his relatives are black,” the Washington Post reported. “There may be no box to check for George Zimmerman, no tidy way to categorize, define, and sort the 28-year-old man whose pull of a trigger on a darkened Florida street is forcing America to once again confront its fraught relationship with race and identity.”
I think the smartest comment on my post came from “Marc” (and, no, it wasn’t me). “Wow—I think this whole conversation says a lot about us,” he said. “Of course, the knee-jerk reaction to his name by us Jews is understandable. You never want to see ‘one of the tribe’ do something so egregious.” Or as a friend of mine put it to me when I first published the article, “This”—that is, this need to know (and deny) that Zimmerman is one of us—”is how we know we’re still a minority.”
Of course, there are more dangerous ways to be a minority. You could, for example, be a black kid wearing a hoodie.
Celebrates Supreme Court victory, says Knesset has no further move
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.