Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Daybreak: Obama Talks of Urgency on Iran

Plus West Bank statehood edifice collapsing, and more in the news

Print Email
President Obama (with Prime Minister David Cameron) yesterday.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

• THE “WINDOW FOR DIPLOMACY IS SHRINKING,” President Obama warned Iran yesterday. He maintained that there is still room and time, however. [Haaretz]

• THE PROSPECT OF WEST BANK STATEHOOD IS HAMPERED by economic slowdown and lowered aid, the World Bank reported. A year ago, the same institution said that economic growth helped make the case for sovereignty. [Haaretz]

• SYRIA’S MAIN OPPOSITION GROUP IS WEAKENING, with several key members leaving, accusing it of being dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood. [NYT]

• PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD SUBMITTED TO UNPRECEDENTED PARLIAMENTARY GRILLING, in one sign of how power relations at the top are not so clear-cut in the Islamic Republic. [NYT]

• IRAN FUNDED, TRAINED, AND ORDERED 22 OPERATIVES to attack Jewish, Israeli, and Western targets in Baku, Azeri police reported. [Haaretz]

• DETERRENCE IS BEST, argues Fareed Zakaria (quoting a young Charles Krauthammer). [WP]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

willy says:

This cat will hide your hat and help you look for it. If you think Barry Sotero is looking out for the welfare of Israel think again. His allegence is to soros the UN, homosexuality, baby killing, bringing down christianity and jews and himself. Bombs away!

Hershel (Heshy) Ginsburg says:

“DETERRENCE IS BEST, argues Fareed Zakaria”

And I sure that Zakaria is willing to test his theory on every last Israeli.

Again, comparing the apocalyptic visioned Iranian leadership who fervently believe that the Mahdi, the 12th Imam will return as a result of fiery war and that his return can be hastened by starting such a war, to an atheistic European-rational USSR demonstrates Zakria’s ignorance about Iran or his ostrichism or both (and maybe MT’s too).

Deterrence is based on MAD – Mutually Assured Destruction, and as the doyen of Middle Eastern scholars, Bernard Lewis has stated many times, for the Iranian leadership MAD is not a deterrent but an incentive.

One more point: Deterrence is necessarily based on believing that you (Iran in this case) believe that nuclear retaliation is guarantied. Assuming Israel were nuked, can you imagine that Obama would attack Iran with nukes?

And even if Israel could still launch a second strike, don’t you hear Obama, Clinton & the EUniks telling Israel to act “with restraint”. I could well imagine Obama telling Israel that if it wants that badly needed aid to rebuild after being nuked, don’t retaliate. I could easily see Zakaria advocating such a position. Indeed at least one military ethicist (Michael Walzer if my memory servers me) pontificated that while it would be moral for Israel to attack Iran even with nukes to prevent being nuked, retaliation after being nuked is a no-no.

Zakria also conveniently forgets that Ayatollah Rafsanjani (whom the “enlightened” & “progressive” media labels a moderate) has publicly mused about Iran losing 1/3 to 1/2 its population in a nuclear exchange as worthwhile sacrifice to get rid of Israel. It was Rafsanjani who coined the term “One bomb country” to describe Israel.

So Zakaria & the Tabletarians who don’t have to take responsibility for their pontifications will forgive me if I decline to be their canary in the Iranian nuclear mine.


J’elm / Efrata

George One says:

Syria: Of course if the present regime falls the MB would take over. This is the case in all the Arab countries. Talk of an Arab Spring, it’s more like an Arab winter or an Arab night. If there’s something worse than a military dictatorship, it is a theocratic dictatorship.

Hershel (Heshy) Ginsburg says:

For a fuller, more intellectually honest discussion of Israel’s Iran conundrum than either Fareed Zakaria or Tablet has to offer, see Ari Shavit in Ha’aretz, here:



Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Daybreak: Obama Talks of Urgency on Iran

Plus West Bank statehood edifice collapsing, and more in the news

More on Tablet:

Making Sex Education Smarter

By Marjorie Ingall — Teenagers need to learn about more than anatomy, as some Jewish educators already know