Fischer For World Bank President?
Probably not; plus, a curious lacuna in the ranks of this position
Despite clamoring from around the world for someone who is from some other part of the world, the White House, which for all intents and purposes controls this process, says that the next president of the World Bank will be an American.
Which brings us to the next question: will it be the fourth Jewish president?
Current president Robert Zoellick is not Jewish—if you thought he is, you were probably confused by that Jew-baiting Adbusters article.
One bookie giving odds has former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers heavily favored and Columbia professor and anti-poverty activist Jeffrey Sachs—who has actually announced that he would love the gig—in second place. Both are Jews.
Farther on down the list is the guy we’d like to see: Stanley Fischer, Israel’s center banker, a former World Bank chief economist, and an all-around genius, who was last seen getting
screwed out of disqualified from the International Monetary Fund’s top job. Fischer isn’t American—he’s Rhodesia-born, London-educated, and now, of course, Israeli—but he did spend a lot of time stateside, specifically teaching at M.I.T. Surely an exception can be made!
Except here’s here’s the thing: there have been 11 World Bank presidents, and not one has been a woman. The twelfth should be a woman. Preferably a Jewish woman.
Despite Calls for Alternatives, Another American Is Expected to Lead World Bank [NYT]
Related: Busted [Tablet Magazine]
Earlier: Israeli Central Banker DQ’d From IMF Job
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.