The Other Zion Square
Website’s right-wing alternative doesn’t want you to know who runs it
Last week, in anticipation of Peter Beinart’s new blog, Zion Square, someone went out and bought the domain name zionsquare.com. It wasn’t Beinart, whose blog is hosted by the Daily Beast. Who was it, then? We don’t know. And why don’t we know? Because whoever it was took pains to hide his or her identity, registering the domain privately. Having learned of the site, my colleague Marc Tracy contacted the site’s nameless proprietors via Twitter and asked them to go on the record. They refused.
It is tempting to ignore this pitiful little bleep on the Web. At the moment, zionsquare.com, unlike Beinart’s elegant site, contains little save blurry graphics and those Danny Ayalon videos you’ve watched a hundred times on YouTube. And I would ignore it, if it weren’t for its cowardly use of what is quickly becoming a bona fide tactic for right-wing hysterics. Like the Columbia student who claimed she was steered away from a pro-Palestinian class—her findings were investigated and promptly dismissed—the perpetrators behind zionsquare.com hope that tactical anonymity might only increase their appeal.
It doesn’t. In its introductory post, the site presents itself as “the focal point of a group of academics, bloggers, journalists, legal professionals, policy wonks, security experts and more, all with extensive knowledge of Israel and the Middle East.” Actually, academics submit their findings, under their own names, for review by their peers. Journalists live and die by their bylines. And so on. The only people who refuse to reveal themselves are scoundrels and cowards.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.