Break-out sessions take over AIPAC
The plenary sessions and tomorrow night’s gala are when the news is made at AIPAC. This afternoon and tomorrow afternoon are many, many breakout sessions spread all around the Brobdingnagian Washington Convention Center. It is somewhat frustratingly scheduled: There was only 15 minutes between the end of the morning plenary and first set of sessions, and only 15 minutes between the first and second sets; there is no lunch-break; and there are an epic number of panels, many of which seem interesting, but none of which seem worth devoting two hours to, especially since there are so many other interesting ones. Such are the compromises of hosting more than 13,000 people. There are, however, cafeterias serving kosher fare “Packed Exclusively for AIPAC.”
Plus, there are people to see, to catch between panels, to meet. And, predictably, the most interesting panels are off-the-record: I was dying to cover famed pollster Frank Luntz’s session, but it is closed to reporters. Amusingly, many of the panels are repeated over the two sessions. For example, Elliot Abrams and Martin Indyk are going mano-a-mano on “A Final Settlement: The Past and Future of Peace Agreements” during both sessions, like repertory theater. Next year, I’ll sit in on both sessions of the same panel.
The Occupy AIPAC protests across Mount Vernon Place are not insubstantial, but neither are they huge, and they certainly haven’t been disruptive to the conference itself.
Oh, and if you haven’t bought a copy of Nextbook Press’ David Ben-Gurion biography by Israeli President Shimon Peres, who spoke this morning, we suggest heading down to the bookstore in the AIPAC Village.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.