Cheney and Harman Disagree, Within Limits
At opening panel at AIPAC, specter of Israel as political wedge issue raised
At a brief opening panel moderated by David Horovitz, late of The Jerusalem Post and now of his own start-up, the Times of Israel (whose diplomatic correspondent also got some face-time), former Democratic Rep. Jane Harman and Liz Cheney, a Republican operative who serves on the Emergency Commitee for Israel’s board (and is the former vice president’s daughter), agreed on the threat Iran posed to Israel but disagreed over how effective current U.S. policy has been.
Said Cheney: “There is no evidence the sanctions are having any effect at all on the nuclear program.” But Harman pointed to various developments, such as the huge devaluing of the Iranian currency, the rial, and to the way the international community has to a large extent come around, as positive consequences the sanctions have had.
In terms of the Palestinians, the tentative reconcilation between Fatah and Hamas makes agreement easy. “The Palestinians will never have a state if they have terrorists in their government,” said Cheney. Harman concurred.
“Israel loses if we make it a political football in this campaign,” Harman said early on.
But when it came to the end and Horovitz asked the panelists to debate what we would be doing this time next year, at the 2013 AIPAC Policy Conference, Cheney responded: “I predict that when we meet next year it will be to celebrate a restored relationship under a brand-new president.” She added: “Remember there are facts. There is no president who has done more to delegitimize the state of Israel in recent history than President Obama.” This got substantial applause. “Remember,” she continued, “what President Obama said to Cairo in June? When he compared the Holocaust to the situation of the Palestinians?”
Harman responded not angrily but firmly. “As I said before, I think it is a grave mistake to turn Israel into a political football.” This got even louder, more enthusiastic applause.
For his part, here was Yaari’s shrug of a prediction: “We will still be debating the Iranian nuclear program, only the Iranian nuclear program will be quite a bit ahead.”
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.