Don’t Do It Like That
Surely we can have political debates without demeaning women
“Debbie does Radical Muslim Fundraiser,” reads a blogpost headline on Republican candidate Joe Kaufman’s campaign website, an obvious, if largely uncreative, allusion to the 1978 pornographic film Debbie Does Dallas. The post is about Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Jewish Democrat from Florida (and head of the Democratic National Committee), giving the keynote address at the annual banquet for Florida non-profit Emerge USA, which Kaufman calls a “radical Muslim group with ties to the Obama Administration.” According to the group’s website, Emerge USA encourages American Muslims to engage politically by voting and becoming active in local government. Kaufman, a Republican mounting a congressional campaign to unseat Wasserman Schultz, singles out Khurrum Wahid, a Florida lawyer and founding member of Emerge USA, who has defended individuals accused of terrorist acts, including Shahawar Matin Siraj, who in 2006 was convicted of a plot to blow up the Herald Square subway station. Wahid is on the board of the Miami Coalition of Christians and Jews.
But let’s back up. Are people actually, in 2012, identifying a female politician by using a riff on a porn title? This is not the first time. In January, the Daily Caller featured a post titled, “The DC Morning: Debbie Does Caucus.” A January video posted on Weasel Zippers was titled “Debbie Does Class Warfare.”
You may well have a legitimate case to make. Why don’t you get back to us when you want to be taken seriously.
Debbie does Radical Muslim Fundraiser [Kaufman for Congress]
The DC Morning: Debbie Does Caucus [Daily Caller]
Debbie Does Class Warfare: People Doing Well Should Not Be Doing “Better”… [Weasel Zippers]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.