Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Daybreak: U.S. Doubts Iran Bomb Program

Plus WikiLeaks makes another splash, and more in the news

Print Email
Uggie of the Oscar-winning The Artist at the ceremony last night. (Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images)

• Despite increased uranium enrichment, U.S. intelligence, consistent with formal findings in 2007 and 2010, believes Iran has not yet decided to pursue a nuclear bomb and indeed may have halted its weapon program in 2003. [NYT]

• Emails newly disclosed by WikiLeaks reveal reports that Israeli and Kurdish commandos destroyed much of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure—followed by severe doubts that this happened. The emails came from Stratfor, the private defense agency which David P. Goldman wrote about. [Haaretz]

• In Iran, which holds parliamentary elections at the end of the week, there is less anger than despondency—many voters are likely to stay home. [WP]

• U.S. and British researchers and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum are petitioning the United Nations to make public 10,000 documents related to war-crimes charges stemming from World War Two. Much more here. [AP/Vos Iz Neias?]

A Separation won Best Foreign Language Film. Any joy you might have, if you enjoyed the movie for example, will be eliminated when you find an Iranian news agency reporting that one of the films it defeated was produced by “the Zionist regime.” [IRIB]

• Of course, then this, from the red carpet, will cheer you up, as will the photo, above, of one star from the Best Picture-winning (and Jewish-written and -directed) The Artist.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

The official remarks from the government of Iran concerning the Academy Awards demonstrates how utterly misinformed they are with respect to Jews. I’d like to know how many Academy members are in fact Jewish.

Marc, have you actually read the Stratfor email exchange? Your tag line above reads pretty generously. The “reports” are pretty thin. Worth reading in full for a laugh:

Hershel (Heshy) Ginsburg says:

This intelligence finding, like its 2007 predecessor, is a fine specimen of ostrachism and useful idiocy. Indeed in early 2008 a US State Department analyst visiting Israel was rather dismissive regarding that intelligence finding.

The finding addresses the the extremely narrow issue of weaponization of the enriched U235, one of the final steps in making an atom bomb. Once all the other pieces are in place the actual weaponization is relatively straightforward. The most technically difficult & rate limiting step is actually the enrichment step & production of a sufficient quantity of U235 (as uranium hexafluoride). Hence the Iranians focus most (but not all) of their efforts on the producing sufficient quantities of U235, but strictly speaking this is not weaponization. Indeed a footnote early in the 2007 intelligence estimate admitted that Iran was focused on enrichment, which was probably for the ultimate purpose of building a weapon (duh…).

But a report like this (which no longer fools the IAEA or the EUniks, but is extremely effective against Tabletarians, the Times, & the Obama White House) is enough of a fig-leaf for the herd of progressobabbelian useful idiots to proclaim that Israel’s concerns are baseless and that Israel should put full faith in the Obamanoids to know when the Iranians actually get “serious” about building a weapon.

So Iran has spent a fortune building enrichment facilities inside a mountain, and has built or is building hardened facilities for other aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle (like a heavy water plant & a heavy water reactor for making plutonium without need of enriched uranium; plutonium provides the nuclear core of Nagasaki / “Fat Man” type atomic bombs) as high school science fair projects.


Efrata / J’lem


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Daybreak: U.S. Doubts Iran Bomb Program

Plus WikiLeaks makes another splash, and more in the news

More on Tablet:

A Tale of Three Twitter Feeds: Hamas Tweets in Arabic, English, and Hebrew

By Aaron Magid — Analysis of the social-media messaging of Hamas’ military wing reveals distinct voices for the West, the Arab Middle East, and Israel