Who’s Afraid of Maggie Simpson?
Islamic Republic outlaws Homer dolls
The Iranian regime has banned all dolls based on characters from The Simpsons. “The Simpsons dolls are merchandise from an animated series, of which some episodes are even banned in Europe and America,” said the relevant apparatchik by way of explanation (yet one more reason, if you needed one, why we shouldn’t be in the business of banning things, be they cartoons of the Prophet or of yellow denizens of Springfield). But surely The Simpsons is especially offensive to the mullahs, right? Herewith, the 10 Simpsons characters most loathed by Tehran:
10. Principal Skinner. Fought bravely for the Great Satan in Vietnam.
9. Lunchlady Doris. Married a guy named Freedman. Look it up.
8. Apu Nahasapeemapetilon. Scurrilous polytheist!
7. Waylon Smithers. “As you can see, the real deal with Waylon Smithers is that he’s Mr. Burns’ assistant. He’s in his early 40s, is unmarried, and currently resides in Springfield.”
6. Kent Brockman. “Brockman,” eh?
5. Artie Ziff. Jewish millionaire voiced by Jon Lovitz.
4. Bart. For much the same reason the Czech Communists feared the Plastic People of the Universe: Bart is rock ‘n’ roll, and rock ‘n’ roll is subversive.
3. Krusty the Clown. Son of Rabbi Hyman Krustofsky. And they dare deny Jews control the entertainment industry!
2. Lisa. Lisa wouldn’t hurt a fly. Instead, she is an extremely bright, curious, inquisitive young woman who is never afraid to say exactly what’s on her mind. It’s difficult to think what could be more threatening to the mullahs. Except …
1. Maggie. Silent. Ever-watching. Omnipresent. Handy with a pistol. Could Maggie be Mossad? Iran can’t take that chance.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.