Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Komen Pulls Planned Parenthood Funding

Moves away from ‘democratizing’ breast cancer

Print Email

A couple months ago, I praised the breast cancer foundation Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s “democratization,” in founder and CEO Nancy Brinker’s word, of a disease that certainly afflicts all but disproportionately afflicts Jewish women (specifically women of Ashkenazic descent, one in 40 of whom possess a genetic mutation that gives them a greater likelihood of getting breast cancer). Yesterday, Komen made itself a little less democratic, halting its funding to Planned Parenthood, the women’s health organization that congressional Republicans have criticized for including abortions and related functions among its panoply of services. Abortion services in fact takes up three percent of Planned Parenthood’s patient care; cancer screening and prevention, by contrast, takes up 16 percent.

As Jill Lepore reported recently, Planned Parenthood actually began much the same way Komen did. Though its founder, Margaret Sanger, was not Jewish, its original receptionist was fluent in Yiddish and it opened on the Lower East Side to serve poor Italian and Jewish women. Its first handbills were translated into Italian and Yiddish; its first landlord was named Rabinowitz, and he gave them a discount because he liked what they did. Later, in the 1960s, Planned Parenthood grew thanks to the efforts of Jewish president Alan F. Guttmacher.

But here’s the difference: those who most need Komen are represented by the people who run Komen; those who most need Planned Parenthood—poor women, including the African-Americans whom Guttmacher was reaching out to—are not. Despite depending on the donations of the wealthy (and government funding), Planned Parenthood altruistically goes beyond its natural constituency. Komen, with this decision, appears not to be, and in fact seems increasingly concerned with rich women, who might be able to afford their own care. “Meet Women Whose Lives Have Been Saved By Early Breast Cancer Screenings,” reads Planned Parenthood’s homepage. There may be fewer to meet in the future because of this decision.

AP Exclusive: Amid Abortion Debate, Komen Cancer Charity Halting Grants to Planned Parenthood [AP/WP]
Related: Birthright [The New Yorker]
Earlier: Pink Is Jewish

Print Email

This has nothing to do with being “democratic.” I do not know where you get that. Here is what Komen said:

“Komen spokeswoman Leslie Aun said the cutoff results from the charity’s newly adopted criteria barring grants to organizations that are under investigation by local, state or federal authorities. According to Komen, this applies to Planned Parenthood because it’s the focus of an inquiry launched by Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., seeking to determine whether public money was improperly spent on abortions.”

The Komen crowd lost all credibility by bowing to Tea Party, anti-abortion loopies. Goodbye


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Komen Pulls Planned Parenthood Funding

Moves away from ‘democratizing’ breast cancer

More on Tablet:

A Tale of Three Twitter Feeds: Hamas Tweets in Arabic, English, and Hebrew

By Aaron Magid — Analysis of the social-media messaging of Hamas’ military wing reveals distinct voices for the West, the Arab Middle East, and Israel