Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


An All-Tablet Super Bowl

Patriots versus Giants. Again.

Print Email
Quarterbacks Tom Brady and Eli Manning after they last played each other, in November. Manning's team, the Giants, won.(Jim Rogash/Getty Images)

After running back BenJarvus Green-Ellis scored the New England Patriots’ first touchdown in the American Football Conference championship game on Sunday, during his celebration he pointed to the black patch, which all his teammates have worn the whole season: “MHK.” The late Myra Kraft, the beloved wife of Pats owner Bob Kraft who died shortly before the season (and whom contributing editor Joan Nathan fondly remembered on The Scroll), has turned into something like a patron saint for a franchise that, despite the 13-3 record and top seed, made its way to its fifth Super Bowl in 11 seasons only after being served the Denver Broncos on a platter last weekend and, yesterday, barely making their way past the Baltimore Ravens, who, offensively challenged as they are, failed to push the game at New England’s home field into overtime only after their kicker missed a 31-yard chip shot at the end of regulation for the 23-20 loss.

The second game, for the National Football Conference championship, was even better and made you feel even worse: better, because it was a true defensive battle, in the rain, at historic Candlestick Park; worse, because the San Francisco 49ers, last year a 6-10 team, had made for a wonderful story by building themselves up to 13-3 and a first-round bye with defensive grit, stellar special teams, and only 10 turnovers in 16 games, only to lose this game because of … two turnovers in the kicking game (committed, incidentally, by the same player, a young wide receiver filling in for normal return man Ted Ginn, who was out with an injury). Just a heartbreaking loss. And the New York Giants’ 20-17 overtime victory means that, for the second year in a row, the NFC will be represented in the big game by its 9-7 sixth seed who got hot.

Yes, the big game: The Super Bowl is fewer than two weeks away in Indianapolis. It is, I won’t be the last to point out, a rematch of four years ago, when the Giants (then the fifth rather than sixth seed) upset the 18-0 Pats. There are plenty more story-lines if you want them: Pats coach Bill Belichick again going up against his old team, the Giants; the Pats playing in Indianapolis, site of their normal archrival Colts; Giants quarterback Eli Manning looking to best his older, better brother Peyton’s one Super Bowl ring with a second of his own on Peyton’s home turf. The betting lines opened with the Pats favored by three. Really? The Giants just won three games on the road—in one of them, they blew out the 15-1 Green Bay Packers—and have exactly the sort of defense (able to create a substantial pass rush without blitzing) suited to taking down New England’s aerial attack. Not that it’s been much of an aerial attack: QB Tom Brady threw one more interception than touchdown yesterday, and for all we know he lost his best target, tight end Rob Gronkowski, injured late yesterday (by the same safety who ended Brady’s 2008 season with a shot to the knees). This Pats team is worse than the one four years ago in most ways; this Giants team has a superior passing game and, possibly, nearly as stout a defense. The indoor turf will favor the Giants’ pass rush and speedy receivers. And the Giants even beat the Pats earlier this year. I don’t expect a blowout, but if there is one, I expect the Giants to come out on top.

Oh, and yes. At the beginning of this season, Tablet Magazine selected three teams. One, to replace the disgraced Washington Redskins, was the Chicago Bears. The other two were our carryovers from last year: the Pats and the Giants. Stay tuned to find out who Tablet’s pick will be.

Our playoff record: 5-0

Earlier: Remembering Myra Kraft
A New Season, A New Team

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

The Giants were the fourth seed, not the sixth, since they were a division winner (though it’s understandable that you;d be confused by all of this being a Redskins fan and forgetting the way things work in the playoffs).

Rich Shapiro says:

Giants were the fourth seed this year.

Shalom Freedman says:

Why is this ‘An All-Tablet’ superbowl? Is there one Jewish player on either team?

I thought that ‘Tablet’ is a magazine that centers on Jewish matters?
There are ten- thousand articles of this kind in Media which have no Jewish connection.

Lord, where to begin.
1) As noted, the G-men were the 4 seed, not the 6, though they had the worst record of any NFC playoff qualifier.
2) Last year’s 6th seed, the eventual champion Packers, were 10-6 during the regular season.
3) You might be thinking of the Arizona Cardinals, a #4 seed with a 9-7 record that advanced to the Super Bowl in 2009.
4) Calling the Ravens offensively challenged without calling the 49ers the same, or calling the Pats or G-men “defensively challenged” is unfair. But I don’t expect anything less from a Skins fan who is bitter that the hick-town between DC and Philadelphia has built a consistently outstanding NFL franchise.
To paraphrase Terrell Suggs’s comment to skip Bayless, “be a reporter, not a douchebag.”

Stu Kaplan says:

He didn’t mention the Giamt’s co-owner, Steve Tisch


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

An All-Tablet Super Bowl

Patriots versus Giants. Again.

More on Tablet:

Rediscovering the First Woman Rabbi

By Laura Geller — Ordained in 1935, Regina Jonas died at Auschwitz. Now, she’s being honored.