What Was Missing From the ‘YU Beacon’ Essay
Sometimes, graphic is good
I received a very shrewd email regarding the YU Beacon controversy, in which the online student-run newspaper lost its affiliation with Yeshiva University and saw one of its co-editors resign after it refused to permanently erase a sexually themed essay. That piece, “How Do I Even Begin To Explain This,” describes a young Orthodox woman’s premarital dalliance with an Orthodox young man in a hotel room. Though not graphic, it does describe a few furtive details, and concludes, “Between the fumbling, the pain, the pleasure, I convince myself that I’ve learned how to make love.”
But has she? One thing the essay doesn’t mention, as my emailer pointed out, is any method of birth control or STD prevention. In the Orthodox community, not all are onboard with contraception; Agudath Israel, for example, protested a New York City campaign to encourage condom use a few years ago. The thinking goes that talking about condoms encourages promiscuity and premarital sex, and premarital sex is verboten. In fact, something like the converse is true: premarital sex is likely to happen, and therefore you may as well discuss condoms, which can prevent unwanted pregnancies and the transmission of disease. In allowing the open discussion of premarital sex, the YU Beacon was, in effect, promoting safer sex. But it would have been nice if it had, so to speak, gone all the way in that department.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.