The GOP’s Pro-Israel Coming Out Party
RJC forum highlights centrality of Mideast to presidential contest
Fred Karger or no, today is a big and, to my mind, successful day for the Republican Jewish Coalition. It is hosting all the leading GOP presidential candidates (except for Rep. Ron Paul) and finds itself perfectly positioned to be one of the key surrogates for the eventual Republican nominee. (Just one telling fact: the response conference call this afternoon is being given not by the head of the National Jewish Democratic Council but by Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the head of the Democratic National Committee). The candidates will re-affirm their own somewhat shaky rhetoric and then go on the offensive. The Times makes the point today that I have been making for awhile: that Israel/Iran is the most fertile foreign policy front against President Obama.
A major thrust of the Republican foreign-policy argument has emerged: that President Obama has not strongly supported Israel and that he has been too soft on its adversaries, Iran, Hezbollah and the Palestinians. That softness, they say, extends to other parts of the world. …
Support for Israel has become something of a litmus test for evangelical Christians in early voting states like Iowa and South Carolina, where large numbers of voters and caucusgoers describe themselves as evangelical. And in the general election, Jewish voters may be critical in swing states like Florida and Pennsylvania.
I think it’s plausible to suppose that strongly Zionist non-Jewish voters may be inclined to take their cues from how they perceive Jewish voters see Obama’s record on Israel and Iran. It’s just one more way in which Jewish voters will have outsize support, and that in turn guarantees that the RJC will continue to have a high profile through Election Day.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.