Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

Bubble Burst

Today on Tablet

Print Email

The end of the Cold War brought the end of the United States’ ability to use its power to control much of the world. But it is only now, writes Mideast columnist Lee Smith today in Tablet Magazine, that the U.S. public is finally being brought to grips by that fact, and they are getting no help from the feckless politicians in both parties.

Lax Americana

Print Email

COMMENTING CHARGES
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at letters@tabletmag.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

It wasn’t the end of the Cold War that created the idea of an America that doesn’t pursue its own interests. Domestic disdain for American exercises of power in the furtherance of its own interests dates back to the 1960s New Left, and was a fairly mainstream left-wing sentiment through the entire latter half of the Cold War. The era of liberal internationalism–roughly from 1945-1965–was actually a brief, anomalous interlude, sandwiched between the eras of conservative establishment isolationism and liberal anti-Americanism.

The underlying constant is that elites in powerful countries are almost always anti-nationalist in temperament. (Think, for example, of the British elite of the 1930s, who disdained patriotism and favored appeasement.) In weak countries, nationalism allows insecure elites to defend their status from external threats to it. In strong countries, however, confident elites risk little by casting themselves as cosmopolitan internationalists–even at the expense of their own homelands’ interests.

Conversely, nationalism in powerful countries tends to be a populist sentiment, embodying the desire of otherwise low-status people to raise their self-image by association with national strength and power. Of course, this lower-class element only intensifies the disgust of the ruling elites at displays of nationalist fervor–or of national power.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Bubble Burst

Today on Tablet

More on Tablet:

Landmark Gay Rights Protest Turns 50

By Jonathan Zalman — Today we celebrate the anniversary of the first-ever march on Washington, led by Frank Kameny