Sanctions and Maybe More
What the West and Israel are planning for Iran
This was the week that the International Atomic Energy Agency report on Iran came out—it strongly argued that Iran continues to pursue nuclear weapons—and not much else happened on that particular front. Some reading on the topic as we head into the weekend:
• Yossi Melman reports that even now experts are significantly divided over how long they think it will take Iran to have a nuclear bomb. [Haaretz]
• Due to concerns about effects on energy markets as well as skepticism that China and Russia can be brought around, you have not heard much noise from the United States on the topic of further sanctions. [Haaretz]
• Actually, it’s France who has taken the sanctions-seeking lead. [Haaretz]
• However, certain sanctions targeted at financial institutions could be just thing thing we’re looking for. [Slate]
• Has Republican frontrunner Mitt Romney changed to a less-hawkish line on Iran? [Wired Danger Room]
• British officials reportedly believe Israel will attack Iran in the next two months. [Haaretz]
• If it did, most if not all of the Sunni Arab Gulf countries would (very quietly) support it. [JPost]
• Israel has the capacity to launch fairly accurate, pinpoint airstrikes against half-a-dozen nuclear targets in western Iran. [Reuters/Vos Iz Neias?]
• An Israel financial firm estimates that the economic costs of such a strike, factoring in the likely consequences, would be catastrophic. [Reuters/Vos Iz Neias?]
So, still, nobody knows anything.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.