More Thoughts on Linking OWS and Israel
How big should the tent be, and where should it be pitched?
I strongly encourage everyone to go read Occupy Judaism activist Daniel Sieradski’s interview with Mondoweiss’ Adam Horowitz; they both do a great job getting quickly to the core of their disagreement, which seems to me to be over whether it is worth jeopardizing the economic message of Occupy Wall Street in favor of pro-Palestinian activism. (I have to think that Horowitz would ultimately admit that this is what he is advocating: as Sieradski tells him, “Knowing how long you yourself have been working on these issues, I am surprised that you would even entertain the idea that OWS won’t be significantly hurt by being seen as anti-Israel.”) Readers of this blog (and, now, readers of Mondoweiss) know where I stand on this, but I certainly am sympathetic to Horowitz’ complaint, “Do you understand why many Palestinian activists viewed the tweet’s deletion [the tweet expressed solidarity with last week’s flotilla] as a sign they are not welcomed in the OWS movement?” The big tent certainly should cut both ways.
Yet again I have trouble seeing how the protest two nights ago of a Birthright event served the broader purposes of OWS, or even the narrower ones of the protesters. It’s notable that the Zuccotti Park occupation is explicitly intended not to disrupt the neighborhood: it’s an occupation not in the sense of exerting control over others but in terms of staking a claim in a place where they felt they had none. Shouting down a speaker at a prearranged event, by contrast, feels like just the sort of thing that people who don’t understand what free speech is label “free speech.”
None of which makes the latest right-wing propaganda about OWS’ fundamental anti-Semitic-ness okay. Particularly amusing is this collection of accusations on Pajamas Media, which includes some anti-Semitic asshole responding to a Jewish man’s obvious provocations, and, pricelessly, an anti-Israel/anti-Semitic protester (he compares the Israelis’ actions in the territories to the Nazis’) getting into an argument with … a pro-Israel protester. Pajamas Media doesn’t point that the existence of both types of protesters suggests it might be wrong to paint the entire movement with the brush of just one of them.
Occupy Wall Street and the Struggle Over Israel/Palestine [Mondoweiss]
Occupy Bursts In on Birthright [New Voices]
Fresh Anti-Semitic Videos Coming Out of Occupy Wall Street [Pajamas Media]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.