“Lost Books” is a weekly series highlighting forgotten books through the prism of Tablet Magazine’s and Nextbook.org’s archives. So blow the dust off the cover, and begin!
You might not know it, but we have Israel Zangwill to thank for the go-to phrase to describe America’s cohesive cultural heterogeneity. Born in 1864, the British playwright wrote a play called The Melting Pot, which featured a romance between a Jewish immigrant and a non-Jewish woman, and which won the approval of President Theodore Roosevelt in October of 1908 for its positive depiction of America. In 2006, upon the very first revival of the play since Zangwill’s 1926 death, Chloe Veltman wrote, “If there was ever anyone capable of turning a metaphor into a household word, it was Israel Zangwill.”
For such a popular playwright, however, Zangwill’s legacy remains largely obscured. An outspoken Zionist after meeting Theodor Herzl in 1895, Zangwill’s politics moreso than his plays garnered attention, and some believe his literary reputation suffered as a result of his political and social activism. Jews were angered by what they felt was an inconsistent yet dogmatic Zionist stance, and were especially inflamed when, in 1923, Zangwill firily declared Zionism dead.
Yet Veltman defends Zangwill against the resulting criticism that the playwright was in favor of a completely homogenized America, as seen through his glorification of the melting pot ideal and seeming abandonment of the Zionist cause. “He was committed to building a Jewish homeland but also understood that Jews had come to a fork in the road:” she wrote, “if full Jewish nationalism could not be achieved, full assimilation into a multi-ethnic melting pot was, for him, the next best thing.”
Read Melting Point, by Chloe Veltman
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.