Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Maybe Israel Won’t Matter in the Election

Charlie Cook weighs in with a counter-theory

Print Email
President Obama yesterday.(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Time for a corrective. I’ve argued and argued that Israel could factor into the presidential election as the Republicans’ symbol—a metonym, really—for President Obama’s general alleged weakness and un-American values. But there is a rebuttal! It goes like this: first, Jewish support for Obama is down because American support for Obama is down, and not for any other reason. And, second: next year, national security generally just won’t factor in. I’ve been in touch with two prominent political scientists in the past weeks, and both have insisted on the latter point.

Charlie Cook, author of the legendary Cook Political Report, had this to say about my clever little theory: “When you’ve got nine percent unemployment, no foreign policy issue is gonna beat unemployment.” He added, “In the absence of some enormous international development, there’s not a chance in the world that non-Jews are going to be voting on anything related to Jews, including Israel. Foreign policy is a non-issue right now—and that’s with Afghanistan and Iraq out there!” He concluded, “There’s a reason why the candidates aren’t really talking about foreign policy.” Well, they are starting to talk about Israel! But he nonetheless has a point.

(As for the Jewish vote, argued: “You have a group that 78 percent voted for Obama, 74 for John Kerry—the fluctuation isn’t that darn much. I’m sure Obama won’t get 78 percent but no other issue is of that importance. I seriously doubt if any serious student of political elections are going to be saying the day after the election that the Jewish vote made a huge difference.”)

And Kyle Kondik, who works with the University of Virginia’s Larry Sabato, offered these insights in an email:

For the first time in a long time, Republicans probably don’t have the dominant position over Democrats in a debate over national security. President Obama can point to the death of Osama bin Laden and relative quiet in Iraq and Afghanistan as positives on foreign policy. Even Libya might turn out OK, to the extent that people are paying attention. But that’s the big problem for Obama—the electorate is focused on the economy. Foreign policy, barring some unexpected development, just doesn’t seem like it will be a big issue in this election.

Now, I fully suspect that Republicans will attack Obama over Israel; there’s some evidence that the Republican candidate in the upcoming NY-9 special House election [Kondik was writing about two weeks ago] has gotten some traction against his Democratic opponent over Obama’s stance on Israel. That may end up being very important in a district where a third of the voters are likely to be Orthodox Jews. But in a larger sense, I’m not sure that Israel—or foreign policy at all—will be a big deal next year. And, if it is, it’s not entirely clear that the Republicans will be able to score any major political points on the president, whether the criticisms of Obama focus on Israel (as they surely will) or on other national security topics.

So Republicans will focus on Israel! But it just won’t work. We shall see. Maybe.

Not a Jewish Issue, a Voter Issue [Ben Smith]
Earlier: Perry’s Ascent Heralds Israel’s Rise as Issue
Bibi, Perry Move In on the Jewish Vote

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Hershel (Heshy) Ginsburg says:

Israel will likely be an issue in key swing states like Florida & Pennsylvania. Don’t even think about “Big Schlepps” this time around. Retirees with the old time concern about Israel simply won’t buy it this time.

Also, I suspect that even if Israel is not a top issue for many Jewish voters, particularly among non-Orthodox die hard Democrats, it may well be a “straw that breaks the camel’s back” issue that when combined with Obama’s overall mediocre performance (I am being generous) pushes them over the top to at least sit out the election if not outright vote Republican (assuming they don’t fear being struck by lightning for voting Republican).



Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Maybe Israel Won’t Matter in the Election

Charlie Cook weighs in with a counter-theory

More on Tablet:

How To Make Middle Eastern Stuffed Vegetables

By Joan Nathan — Video: Filled with warm rice and unexpected spices, they’re perfect for a cool autumn night—as a side dish or vegetarian entree