Post-Loss, Pre-Holidays, Admin. Sells Itself
VP playing major role in effort to shore up Jewish Democrats
Tuesday’s special election defeat is being chalked up in part to President Obama’s weakened popularity among Jewish voters, due to his perceived shakiness on Israel. The loser, David Weprin, admitted as much. Writing today in Tablet Magazine, Ben Jacobs found as much on the ground. The New York Times cites Rep. Eliot Engel, Democrat of New York, who argues that Obama too frequently blames Israel and the Palestinians equally. And perhaps the best indication that the administration has an Israel problem with the Jews is that it thinks it does, as indicated by several efforts to solve it.
Even last week, the National Jewish Democratic Council had started an outreach effort to Jewish-American supporters to spread the good word. Activists and the like met with Sen. Harry Reid and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, as well as Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Democratic National Committee chairwoman and a Jew. (Wasserman Schultz was part of a post-election spin call with reporters yesterday, along with Sen. Chuck Schumer.) The administration’s main pitchman is actually turning out to be Joe Biden, which, Ron Kampeas notes, “underscored the president’s problem: The vice president has the better reputation on Israel.” The NJDC also touted Prime Minister Netanyahu’s praise for Obama’s important intervention in the embassy riot last weekend.
The time is ripe for this pushback because of the upcoming activity at the United Nations—where, among other things, the administration has expended real international political capital to pledge a veto of a Palestinian resolution in the Security Council. It’s also a crucial moment because the High Holidays, when Jews around the land gather in synagogues to listen to their rabbis lecture them about Israel, are right around the corner.
Also, the adminstration’s support for Israel is featured prominently on AttackWatch, a new campaign Website designed to rebut Republican talking points. It contains some complimentary words from Defense Minister Barak and President Peres. Conspicuously absent, however, is any praise from Netanyahu, and the quote from former Defense Secretary Robert Gates rings slightly hollow in light of contributing editor Jeff Goldberg’s scoop that Gates considered Israel an “ungrateful” ally. Still, Obama’s speech to AIPAC, linked to on the site, contains some useful boilerplate: “The bonds between the United States and Israel are unbreakable and the commitment of the United States to the security of Israel is ironclad.” Expect the administration to play up its military cooperation with the Jewish state, which by many accounts has been unprecedently robust.
Want a rebuttal to the rebuttal? Dan Senor, a former Bush administration adviser, argues that Obama’s problem is political because it is also substantial: he has explicitly sought to put daylight between his country and Israel, Senor argues, and has condemned settlements with unjustified harshness. Yet many of his charges seem strained. Obama’s Arab Spring speech “focused on a demand that Israel return to its indefensible pre-1967 borders with land swaps”? That wasn’t the speech’s focus; it wasn’t a demand; and the land swaps are what are supposed to make the borders defensible. Ah, I’ll save the argument for after the sermon.
Seeing Ripple in Jewish Vote [NYT]
Democrats’ Obama Outreach Starting with Fellow Democrats [JTA]
Israel and Middle East Falsehoods [AttackWatch]
Why Obama Is Losing the Jewish Vote [WSJ]
Related: The Ambassador Speaks [Tablet Magazine]
Republican-Jewish Coalition [Tablet Magazine]
Weprin: Israel ‘Certainly Was a Major Part of It’ [Washington Jewish Week]
Robert Gates Says Israel Is an Ungrateful Ally [Bloomberg View]
Earlier: Special Election Defeat Is Obama’s Loss
N.Y-9 Voters Think Obama ‘Not Pro-Israel’
Plus Israel clears out embassy in Jordan, and more in the news
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.