Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Special Election Defeat Is Obama’s Loss

Democrat goes down in Weiner’s heavily Jewish former district

Print Email
The victor, Bob Turner, during voting yesterday.(Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Tevi Troy, writing in our pages in June, predicted this. Former New York City mayor Ed Koch “almost perfectly captures the views of a certain type of older—often but not always Jewish—Democrat who is nonetheless skeptical of his party on national security issues,” Troy wrote. “While Koch usually backs his party’s candidate, he also seems to have an uncanny ability to back a Republican—tacitly or explicitly—when the Democrats are going to lose.” Troy was referring to Koch’s opposition to President Obama, whom Koch accused of selling Israel out with his “1967 borders” speech. Age has not dimmed Hizzoner’s savvy: he quickly latched onto the special congressional election in New York’s ninth district—a solidly Democratic area in Brooklyn and Queens vacated by Anthony Weiner—and told the Jews who make up roughly one-third of the district’s voters to vote against the Democrat, a strongly pro-Israel Orthodox Jew named David Weprin, specifically to send Obama a message.

Message received. Loud and clear. The Republican candidate, Bob Turner, defeated Weprin, by something like 54 to 46 percent, becoming the first Republican to hold the district since the early 1920s. This non-Jew did so on the strength of Orthodox Jews’ opposition to Obama’s—not Weprin’s—Israel polices (and, to a lesser extent, opposition to Weprin’s support for gay marriage). “Revenge of the Jews,” proclaimed Matt Drudge’s Website.

Here is some quick reading for the morning:

• Nate Silver, polls and elections analyst extraordinaire, gave some good advice for interpreting special elections last night. Translation: no, this isn’t idiosyncratic; yes, this really was about Obama; yes, it is bad news for Obama; no, it is not that bad news for Obama. Indeed, this morning, Silver argued, “For Democrats, It’s 2010 All Over Again.” [NYT FiveThirtyEight]

• The New York ninth is spectacularly unrepresentative of America demographically (for one thing, there are a lot of Orthodox Jews), and this special election was spectacularly unrepresentative of normal elections. [Ben Smith]

• The Turner campaign accused the Weprin campaign of calling Jewish households and billing themselves as “Jews for Jesus for Turner,” which would indeed be a bit of brilliant (and hugely unethical) reverse psychology. [Washington Times]

• The Turner campaign got ready to file legal papers over allegedly fraudulent returns. Turner’s attorney claimed “at least five” dead people had voted. Maybe they were just Mets fans? Ba-zing! [ABC News/Voz Iz Neias?]

• Ed Koch called on Obama to declare that an attack on Israel is an attack on the United States. Obama immediately agreed and asked if Koch would happen to desire all the finest wines and cigars in the land. [Newsmax]

• Weprin got at least one vote: Anthony Weiner’s. [NY Post]

Really, the most important news yesterday concerning next year’s presidential elections is Pennsylvania Republicans’ rumblings to change their state’s winner-take-all electoral-vote system, which could singlehandedly ruin Obama’s chances. But we will leave a daily magazine of political life and culture to discuss that. For us: JEWS. OBAMA HAS A PROBLEM WITH THEM.

Related: Koch Test [Tablet Magazine]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

I am forced to conclude that the Jewish organ of public accountibility has become a mouthpiece for the federal government. We Jewish People know we get the ropes around our neck; first in line as the occidental culture and society becomes an endangered entity, resulting from the demographic reality swallowing them alive. We are at our best when we attach ourselves to no government, live according to our means and keep a low profile.

Velma Adams says:

Those who voted for Turner used one Social Issue to help continue gridlock in Washington. What message did you feel you were sending to Obama. You would rather vote for radical racists who want to take away all rights from the American people and protect only the wealthy and the corporations to try to get Obama to make a different decision about Israel. Why it was just last week that Obama interceded on behalf of Israel to free the Israeli Embassy workers in Cairo. I guess that wasn’t enough even though Netanyhu expressed extremem gratitude on the Presidents intercession. I am most disappointed in Ed Koch, for who I voted, with his short sighted decision to back a man who is corporate executive who wants to go to Washington and cut all federal programs that help the middle class and poor. This is a direct quote from last night when he one.
Well these people who voted for this person get to live with their decision and will all be for naught. Those who only like government when it is convenient, like taking away a woman’s right make decisions about her body, but you want to do away with regulations, laws, etc. and create an Anarchy. This way our planes will fall from the sky because no one will have regulations on them, our food will poison us because no one will be inspecting the food. This way, the companies and corporations that handle these areas will be able to cut corners and save money and get richer. I know this is what you people want.
As for Ed Koch. I used to respect him. I now don’t.

neal sturman says:

dear velma, your right. we get to live with our decisions. we been living in hell for the past 2 1/2 years.

henry gottlieb says:

No it is OUR loss, both the jews and americas

Anyway I appreciate this short article very much, I do hope you could very well blog far more about that.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Special Election Defeat Is Obama’s Loss

Democrat goes down in Weiner’s heavily Jewish former district

More on Tablet:

Why the Teenage Girls of Europe Are Joining ISIS

By Lee Smith — Because they want the same things that teenage boys want: a strong sense of meaning and purpose