Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


But Seriously, Where Is Jerusalem?

Official White House photographs leave ‘Israel’ out of ‘Jerusalem’ captions

Print Email
Jerusalem. Israel.(Gali Tibbon/AFP/Getty Images)

Recent controversy over Jerusalem’s status as the capital of Israel—or, rather, the suddenly high-profile debate over whether Jerusalem should in fact be referred to as being a part of Israel—has been compounded by the discovery that official captions of official White House photographs taken during the Obama administration in Jerusalem, Israel now refer only to the city, and no longer the country, in which the photos were taken.

If this seems startling, you might be relieved to learn that this same policy was in effect during the Bush administration, and likely went further back than that. If that still seems startling, last month Marc Tracy deduced that while according to the latest AP Stylebook, the dateline for articles written in Tel Aviv is “TEL AVIV, Israel,” the dateline from Jerusalem is just that: “JERUSALEM.”

“In many of the cases,” Tracy wrote, “the clarifying country is pretty clearly left out because it is unnecessary: Most readers don’t need to be told which countries ‘BEIJING,’ ‘ROME,’ or indeed ‘KUWAIT CITY’ are in. But I wonder if the inclusion of Jerusalem, coupled with the exclusion of Tel Aviv, isn’t a shrewd posture of neutrality.”

What the caption confusion reveals, more than any larger statement on Israel being made by the Obama administration, as some have sought to argue, is that this is a sensitive issue that perhaps demands more care, and attention, than most other photograph captions might.

Adam Kredo writes:

“Explained a pro-Israel Democrat who had initially called me in a panic over the photo snafu: ‘The real problem here isn’t that the White House didn’t write ‘Jerusalem, Israel’ because that’s been consistent with U.S. policy. The issue is that the person in the White House [who approves the captions on these photos] doesn’t have an understanding of the president’s Middle East policy of the policy surrounding Middle East peace. They should have somebody fluent in Middle East issues vetting all White House materials on this subject.’”

Obama follows Bush on Jerusalem [Washington Jewish Week]
White House Cleanses Israel from Website [The Weekly Standard]
Earlier: Where is Jerusalem?

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Meh–who cares? I’d rather see the President raise taxes and create jobs.

>>>Meh–who cares? I’d rather see the President raise taxes and create jobs.

I’d rather see the President not raise taxes, and stop spending the money we don’t have. I’d also like to see Obama create an atmosphere where jobs can be created…that’d be by getting rid of Obamacare.

So I guess that this policy should apply to all of California and the Southwest USA as all this territory was stolen from Mexico in a trumped war in 1848.

Snap out of it says:

Seriously Tablet editors, this is a gross dissapointment for a publication that has not been afraid, in the past, to ask people to take their blinders off and look at the Israel / Palestine situation from a larger perspective. This argument that the world doesn’t know where Jerusalem is but they do know where Bejing is, and therefore “Israel” should be included in these captions is by far the stupidest, most self-centered, most disgustingly self-aggrandizing piffle ever published here, and is not worthy of your otherwise enlightened publication. I always thought that this pretextual crap was exactly what Tablet strove avoid editorially. Guess I was wrong.

Singerman says:

As one great man once said: “Jerusalem, Jerusalem killer of the prohpets and all good things sent to you…” I defintely would not want to claim Jerusalem as the capital of my state. It’s a ‘white washed grave full of dead mens bones.’


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

But Seriously, Where Is Jerusalem?

Official White House photographs leave ‘Israel’ out of ‘Jerusalem’ captions

More on Tablet:

Kerry Links Rise of ISIS With Failed Peace Talks

By Lee Smith — Secretary of State: ‘I see a lot of heads nodding’