Max Brenner and the Chocolate Boycott
Anti-Israel activists target Australian branch of Israeli chocolate chain
A boycott of the Max Brenner chocolate shops in Melbourne, Australia, has escalated, following the July 1 arrest of 19 protestors outside the store and a follow-up protest July 29 that drew 300 people. More than ten of the 19 anti-Israel activists arrested in early July were ordered not to go within 50 meters of the store—so when four of them, active in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, showed up July 29, they were arrested for violating the terms of their bail.
Founded in 1996 in Ra’anana, the Israel-based chain of chocolate specialty cafes has locations around the world and, since 2001, has been part of Israeli food company the Strauss Group. The boycott has drawn the attention of Michael O’Brien, the region’s minister for consumer affairs, who has requested an investigation into whether the boycott violates Australian law.
“According to a press statement O’Brien released, a large number of people gathered outside a Max Brenner store in downtown Melbourne on July 1 ‘preventing potential customers from entering the store as part of an orchestrated campaign to impose a secondary boycott on the commercial activities of businesses with Israeli ownership and that carry on business with the government of Israel.’
‘I am concerned that the persons and organizations who caused these disturbances may have engaged in secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss or damage to Max Brenner’s business,’ O’Brien said.”
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.