U.S. Re-Upping Syrian Ambassador
In face of horrors and condemnations, engagement still continues
Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Kuwait recalled their ambassadors to Syria in protest of President Bashar Assad and his regime’s mounting violence against its own people—its brutal siege against the once-free city of Hama is now entering its second week, and only yesterday it began a new one in the eastern city of Deir al-Zour. Last week, the U.N. Security Council issued a “presidential statement” condemning “widespread violations of human rights and the use of force against civilians by the Syrian authorities.” And last Friday, the United States decided to … send its ambassador back to Damascus so that, to quote a State Department spokesperson, he can “remain engaged with the Syrian government to make clear that the Assad regime’s brutal repression of the Syrian people must cease immediately.”
This is … a curious decision. One need not be a staunch, ideological opponent of engaging with all regimes that one dislikes to nonetheless believe that engagement with this particular regime has run whatever course of usefulness it may have had. Precisely because the U.S. ambassador, Robert Ford, did such a brave, stellar job bringing attention to the plight of the Syrian protesters and staking the U.S. on their side, we can know with all the more certainty that the regime’s response—which was to organize the threatening of the U.S. and French embassies and then to bombard Hama, the very city that Ford visited—indicates that, as columnist Lee Smith argued last week, engagement is futile. At a time when American treasure and prestige is being spent fighting for regime change in Libya, the continual acknowledgment of the Syrian rulers is mind-boggling (well, maybe it’s understandable) and disheartening. Ford’s is a recess appointment, due to expire at the end of the year unless the Senate acts. Hopefully he will be confirmed as the envoy to a totally new Syrian regime at that time. But that is not the smart bet right now.
Washington Sends Its Ambassador Back to Damascus [JPost]
Three Arab Countries Recall Ambassadors to Syria [NYT]
Syria Forces Extend Siege on Hama as Toll Rises [NYT]
Syrian Military Mounts Assult in Another City [NYT]
Security Council Rebuke of Syria Ends Prolonged Deadlock [NYT]
Related: Mad Men [Tablet Magazine]
Earlier: Assad Cracks Down Hard in Hama
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.