The Semi-Free City of Hama
But the Syrian regime and its domestic opponents share a view of Israel
Intrepid New York Times reporter Anthony Shadid and photographer Moises Saman were perhaps the first Western journalists in Hama, Syria’s fourth-largest city, since the regime, which elsewhere continues to violently crack down on dissent, essentially abandoned the city. Shadid’s report and Saman’s pictures are essential reading and viewing. Hama is currently some sort of large-scale experiment, a place in Syria that is actually free, except with the knowledge that the current state of affairs cannot possibly last.
Hama is also uniquely situated: It was the site of one of the most brutal crackdowns in modern Middle Eastern history, when Syrian President Bashar Assad’s father, Hafez, killed 100,000 to put down an Islamist uprising in 1982; and indeed, Islamism is more pervasive in Hama than in most other Syrian cities (the absence of members of the Assad family’s Alawite sect was a large reason why the regime decided to withdraw). I noted yesterday that the regime has resorted to playing the Israel card in a bid to unify the people, and if Shadid’s article is any indication, it can be played right back: A protest banner in a main square reads, “Here is Hama. It is not Tel Aviv.” Hama seems to tell us that no matter what emerges from what can increasingly be termed an all-out Syrian civil war, it is not likely to be particularly friendly to its Jewish neighbor (even as said neighbor wishes it well).
In Scarred Syria City, a Vision of Life Free From Dictators [NYT]
A Western Photographer in Hama, Syria [Lens]
Netanyahu to Arab Media: People of Syria Deserve a Better Future [Haaretz]
Earlier: Amidst Crackdown, Syria Recognizes Palestine
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.