How The Gaza Ship Was Diverted
And why, contra Hamas, it was no ‘war crime’
A few more details on the Israeli navy’s successful interception of the Dignite al-Karama, the lone vessel from the thwarted flotilla that managed to make its way close enough to Gaza to be confronted. This was a French yacht bearing 16 passengers and crew, which set out from the French island of Corsica, anchored in international waters, initially reported that it was headed for Alexandria, Egypt—a calculated lie that was nonetheless, the ship says, perfectly legal—and then headed for Gaza. It was trailed by IDF ships, which made radio contact, confirmed that it bore no cargo and that its destination was Gaza, and ordered it to turn away. “After dialogue reached a dead end,” said the IDF’s chief spokesperson, “naval commandos boarded the yacht and took control of it without facing resistance.” These commandos were members of the elite Shayetet 13 group. The Dignite al-Karama was diverted to Ashdod, on the Israeli coast; the passengers will be questioned and then turned over to immigration authorities.
Hamas quickly accused Israel of “piracy, a war crime and a violation of the principles of human rights.” Actually, though, even many opponents of Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza concede that it is arguably legal, and certainly no war crime. In a sense, everyone got what they wanted today: Those aboard the yacht—whose lack of cargo serves to prove further that their mission was purely symbolic—forced Israel to enforce its blockade, which, if you believe the blockade is unjust, means Israel just drew attention to its injustice; Israel upheld its policy; and nobody, kennahurra, was the worse for wear afterward. On all sides, that’s how it’s supposed to work.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.