Ambassador Ford Stands Up for Syrians
But do his words and deeds represent a policy shift?
Exactly one week ago, U.S. Ambassador Robert Ford visited the Syrian city of Hama, which has been a stronghold of protest during the months-long uprising against President Bashar Assad’s regime (which has in turn violently attempted to suppress the uprising). Ford’s courageous appearance prompted newfound bravery among the protesters and set in motion a chain of events that included Assad-backed Syrians’ storming the U.S. and French embassies and Secretary of State Clinton issuing the strongest statement against the Syrian regime of any high-ranking U.S. official. (The Obama administration’s position is still not clear: Mideast columnist Lee Smith, who was skeptical of appointing Ford—though not of Ford himself—has wondered whether Ford’s act was a harbinger.)
Most eloquently and inspiringly, Ford himself took to Facebook and published a fierce rant, in English and Arabic, noting “how ironic that the Syrian Government lets an anti-U.S. demonstration proceed freely while their security thugs beat down olive branch-carrying peaceful protesters elsewhere.” He declared, “Hama and the Syrian crisis is not about the U.S. at all. This is a crisis the Syrian people are in the process of solving. It is a crisis about dignity, human rights, and the rule of law.”
So, who is Robert Ford? An excellent Washington Post profile from earlier this week and an exclusive Foreign Policy phone interview yesterday by the tastefully named Marc Lynch help enlighten us. A modest Peace Corps vet who is married to a fellow diplomat, Ford emerged into prominence in the middle part of last decade when a group of respected State Department Arabists stepped in to try to manage the Iraq War after it had turned into a debacle. In January he was named the first U.S. envoy to Damascus since the previous one was recalled in early 2005, in response to the Syrian government’s suspected involvement in the assassination of a former Lebanese prime minister; because Ford’s was a recess appointment, it will expire at the end of the year without Senate approval.
To Lynch, Ford repeated that his mission is not about U.S. interests but those of the Syrian people. Alluding to the hopes, held for a long time by many, that Assad has the potential to be a reformer, Ford countered, “I have seen no evidence yet in terms of hard changes on ground that the Syrian government is willing to reform at anything like the speed demanded by the street protestors. If it doesn’t start moving with far greater alacrity, the street will wash them away.”
Most crucially, though, is to what extent Ford was acting on his own, as it were, and to what extent his actions represented the front-tip of new, more hard-line U.S. administration policy. Signs point to the latter. Lynch reports, “Ford’s sharp criticism of the Syrian government’s violence against peaceful protestors and detailed outline of multilateral and American diplomatic efforts to pressure the Syrian regime suggest that the recent U.S. rhetorical escalation does mark a new stage in the ongoing crisis.”
And Ford himself told Lynch, “I’m not going to stop the things I do. I can’t. The president has issued very clear guidance. It’s morally the right thing to do.”
Our Man in Damascus [Foreign Policy]
Low-Key U.S. Diplomat Transforms Syria Policy [WP]
Related: A Note from Ambassador Robert Ford [U.S. Embassy Damascus Facebook]
Shadow Play [Tablet Magazine]
Hillary Clinton Says Syria’s Assad Has Lost Legitimacy [AFP/Times of India]
Earlier: In Syria, Mobs Threaten U.S., French Enemies
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.