In N.Y., Gay Marriage Came Courtesy GOP Jews
Staunch Republicans still backed Democratic measure
In Michael Barbaro’s definitive narrative of how gay marriage was passed in New York, Andrew Cuomo savvily harnessed his own popularity, his constituents’ support, and a few rich Republican machers to bring marriage equality to the third most populous state. The wild card there is those Republicans who helped hand a Democratic governor a gigantic substantive and political victory.
Do I need to tell you what those few Republicans tend to have in common?
JTA’s Ron Kampeas noticed a month ago that several prominent Jewish Republican New Yorkers were backing same-sex marriage, and indeed, the three Republicans mentioned up top in Barbaro’s article as having worked most closely with Cuomo—the financiers Peter Singer, Cliff Asness, and Daniel Loeb—are all mentioned by Kampeas. As is the financier Steven A. Cohen. As is Ken Mehlman, the 2004 Bush campaign director, a Jewish gay man who tried to sell Republican state senators on gay marriage and who, in the weeks leading up to last Friday’s historic vote, lobbied several one-on-one, including all four who jumped across the aisle to vote yea.
Moreover, while National Review’s The Corner was freaking out over the Armageddon of adults being permitted to marry whomever they choose (“We are witnessing tyranny today that is fostered by a false sense of freedom,” wrote former site editor Kathryn Jean Lopez), the sole post on Commentary’s Contentions blog about the vote saw its author praising New York for enacting gay marriage “by legislation rather than judicial fiat” and applauding Cuomo (albeit at the expense of his father, the liberal hero Mario). Prominent Jewish conservative David Frum admitted, “I was wrong about same-sex marriage.” (And let’s not forget that Sen. Joe Lieberman was pivotal to allowing gays to serve openly in the military.) It truly is fitting that the decisive vote for gay marriage was delivered by a Jewish Republican. Why are Jews liberals? Maybe because of moments like this?
Anyway, if President Obama’s perceived stance on Israel is valid grounds for questioning whether he will win Jewish votes in 2012, then it is also legitimate to ask whether the Republican presidential candidate’s position against gay marriage—no matter who it is, he or she will have to be against it to win the nomination—might threaten his or her standing with Jewish voters in the general. It didn’t stop Mehlman from helping Bush, who endorsed a Constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage (although Mehlman did not come out until the Obama presidency). But with this issue more prominent, voters’ hands could be forced.
Behind N.Y. Gay Marriage, an Unlikely Mix of Forces [NYT]
Jewish, Republican, Pro-Gay Rights [Capital J]
Gay Marriage’s Unlikely Hero [The Daily Beast]
The Do-Something Son of the Do-Nothing Father [Contentions]
I Was Wrong About Same-Sex Marriage [CNN]
Related: Tribal Allegiance [Tablet Magazine]
Earlier: Rabbinic Scion Clinches Same-Sex Marriage
Plus, are Jewish Dems leaving Obama? and more in the news
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.