A Classic Jewish Tale, Starring Indians
Preet Bharara vs. Raj Rajaratnam in ‘The New Yorker’
In his excellent New Yorker report on the Galleon hedge fund corruption case, George Packer makes a leitmotif out of the fact that this Manhattan-set tale of financial misdeeds, vengeful prosecution, and men yelling at one another has a cast of mostly Indian-American characters. And the subtext of that leitmotif is that, certainly 25 or even 10 years ago, most of the characters would have been of a different ethnicity. Packer hints at this in the first paragraph: Contrasting the buttoned-up consultant Anil Kumar, who hails from India, with the garrulous trader Raj Rajaratnam, a Tamil from Sri Lanka, he notes, “In an earlier generation of immigrant financiers, Kumar would have been the German Jew, Rajaratnam the Russian.”
The article’s hero, as well as the prime exemplar of this undercurrent, is Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. He “is, like so many others in the Galleon story, a Punjabi.” But he also grew up in Jersey. And got his job because he was Chuck Schumer’s chief counsel. And is married to a half-Indian Muslim, half-Israeli woman (“The Bhararas have three young children, religious affiliation unknown,” Packer adds cheekily). Moreover, Bharara is clearly a type of character with which readers of Tablet Magazine are familiar:
As a Democrat from New Jersey in his forties, Bharara inevitably loves Bruce Springsteen and watches The Daily Show. When Bharara was interviewed at the White House for the U.S. Attorney’s job, he was asked if he had been born in India. Yes, Bharara replied. But was he a citizen of the United States? “Damn,” Bharara said. “You’ve got to be a citizen for this job?”
So are Indian-Americans the new Jews? They are clearly getting there. Then again, the article’s climax comes when the CEO of Goldman Sachs testfies at Rajaratnam’s trial, and is given the celebrity treatment. And the CEO of Goldman is, of course, Lloyd Blankfein.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.