Israel’s Fischer Wouldn’t Not Accept IMF Gig
‘We’ll see what happens,’ he says as others sing his praises
“All of the press has been very nice compared to what is usually in the Israeli press,” said Stanley Fischer yesterday. “But when I was job hunting at MIT, the professors there taught: ‘Don’t accept a nomination you haven’t been offered yet.’” And with that—yes, including that subtle reminder that he was once at MIT, where he was the Ph.D. thesis adviser for N. Gregory Mankiw and Ben Bernanke—the Bank of Israel governor made his first public comment about all the talk that he could be named the next head of the International Monetary Fund.
And he could: Basically, Fischer would need to be seen as a compromise candidate to replace former IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn should neither the French front-runner Christine Lagarde nor the Mexican alternative candidate Agustin Carsten garner majority support; the Zambia-born, Americanized Israeli would likely need to be perceived as African, and the IMF’s rule for not granting full terms to those over 65 would need to be waived in the case of the 67-year-old Fischer. But given the run of praise and endorsements he has recently received—from the Economist, Financial Times, and Washington Post, as well as from finance elites, including the head of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development—this is looking more and more likely (or less and less unlikely, anyway). Rarely is economics this exciting!
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.