Fischer to the IMF: It Could Happen!
How Israel’s central banker would land the top job
So, did you bet on Israeli central banker Stanley Fischer to be the next International Monetary Fund head when I told you to? Pity: Despite the fact that he is over 65 (and you’re not supposed to get the top IMF spot for a full term if you’re over 65), and that Israel itself has endorsed France’s Christine Lagarde, there is a weirdly possible scenario wherein Fischer could be seen as the peacemaker candidate and slip in. He is said to want it. And actually, it could be the United States that effectively puts him there.
You need a majority vote to be elected. Lagarde is the clear front-runner, and she will have the 35 percent that Europe provides in voting. But also running is Mexican central bank governor Agustin Carsten, who might receive the backing of much of the world, which is fed up with the fact that every single IMF head, in its 60-year history, has been European. Moreover, the U.S., with its 17 percent voting share, has the ability to get Lagarde in—or not. If the U.S. chooses not to back Lagarde, and neither she nor Carsten can garner majority support, then Fischer could be the compromise candidate. Part of the trick is that Fischer was born in Zambia and therefore could be presented as an African candidate (maybe). The rest of the trick is that Fischer is undeniably brilliant, mentored everyone important, and even has the respect of many Arab countries.
Betting’s expired. But those 16:1 odds aren’t looking so terrible now.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.