The Boldness of a ‘Non-Militarized’ Palestine
Obama’s massively pro-Israel gesture has been overlooked
Of the many staunchly pro-Israel facets of the U.S. policy that President Obama laid out in speeches last Sunday and last Thursday, one of the more remarkable—and least remarked-upon—is that America believes the future Palestinian state should be “a sovereign, non-militarized state” (Thursday). We should pause for a second and note what this communicates about Obama’s priorities, namely, the obvious importance he places on Israel’s exceptional security requirements, and the lengths to which he is willing to go to assure the safety of Israel and its inhabitants.
Here is a list of all non-militarized countries. At least one of three things is true of all of them: They are tiny island nations (Kiribati, Samoa, Iceland); they are even tinier city-states (Lichtenstein, Monaco, Vatican City); or they are very tiny to merely very small countries in the Western Hemisphere that are obviously under the American security umbrella and in its sphere of influence under the Monroe Doctrine (Panama, Grenada, Costa Rica). A Palestinian state situated on the West Bank (roughly—don’t forget about those “mutually agreed land swaps”) would be, of course, none of these things: Far from being an island nation, it would be landlocked (unless somehow Gaza managed to be included, in which case it would have less than 25 miles of coastline); would not be a city-state; and would be located not only far outside the Western Hemisphere but in a region known for conflict—certainly it would not be under the U.S. security umbrella and in the U.S. sphere of influence the way, say, Costa Rica is.
How about size? Here is a list of the countries in the world by land mass. The Palestinian territories—the West Bank and Gaza—are 6,220 square kilometers. That makes the theoretical future state of Palestine larger than such militarized countries as Luxembourg, Brunei, Singapore, Bahrain (!), Tonga, and Trinidad & Tobago. Kosovo—a country still not formally recognized by the U.N. Security Council (because of Russian and Chinese objections), and also landlocked, and also in a part of the world known for conflict, certainly is not “non-militarized.” It is roughly two-thirds the size of the Palestinian territories (it is also smaller than just the West Bank).
This is not an argument against a “non-militarized” Palestine. (I support a non-militarized Palestine!) But it is worth fully grasping the extent to which Obama has pledged to go to bat for Israel and Israeli interests, especially in light of charges, by the Israeli right and the American right, that he has sold it out.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.